I saw an article about this sometime over the weekend, and I was struck by how bold (not in a good way) they were to do this.
There were clues that gave away the fact that the "journal" was not legit, but it was little things that most doctors would not have recognised. The intention was definitely to deceive, and aparently they did a pretty good job of it.
Comments 5
There were clues that gave away the fact that the "journal" was not legit, but it was little things that most doctors would not have recognised. The intention was definitely to deceive, and aparently they did a pretty good job of it.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Venereal Beauty?
Vituperative Bears?
Virtuous but Brummagem?
Vicissitudes of Balneotherapy?
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Oh, but that study I am in is funded by a drug/treatment company. I am part of the problem!!
Reply
Leave a comment