Free Money!

May 26, 2012 10:12

Disturbing the tumble weeds and in this community, I'm at askance at whether anyone here fancies themselves a bit of an expert on Free Money, as a means to reduce the negative effects of Liquidity Preference?

It intrigues me as a concept and even more so because of its apparent (limited testing) success.

Leave a comment

Comments 12

laudre May 26 2012, 01:57:27 UTC
In what way would this be distinguishable from modern fiat currency, at least in theory?

Beyond that, the function of money as a store of value that this seems to be aimed against is a feature, not a bug. Same thing with interest rates.

Reply

tcpip May 26 2012, 10:21:45 UTC
My limited understanding (which is why I pitched to the community) is that it would be that money supply would be stable.

Reply

lesslucid May 26 2012, 12:32:29 UTC
What benefits would come from a stable money supply that we don't already get from a low, reasonably predictable level of inflation?

The money supply is strongly affected by the amount of borrowing and lending that banks do. Wouldn't this "free money" involve a great deal of large and dramatic shifts in the availability of cash, with accompanying disruptive effects on the real economy?

Reply

tcpip May 26 2012, 22:50:11 UTC
What benefits would come from a stable money supply that we don't already get from a low, reasonably predictable level of inflation?

I think the removal of liquidity preference would be a feature that would be superior to low levels of inflation.

Wouldn't this "free money" involve a great deal of large and dramatic shifts in the availability of cash, with accompanying disruptive effects on the real economy?No, quite the opposite. My understanding is that one of the arguments is that without constant input of extra money in the economy, the demand for money would fall in proportion to reductions in circulation (due to liquidity preference). As demand falls, unsurprisingly, producers lower prices to compensate. However when this is witnessed by consumers, they withhold purchases (relative to elasticity and necessity of demand) in order to acquire the lowest possible price. This leads to even less circulation.... eventually leading to recession and depression ( ... )

Reply


mcfnord May 26 2012, 06:18:17 UTC
"In 2006 milestones were placed, beginning from the railroad station through the downtown, to show this history, on top of questioning the authenticity of never-ending exponential growth triggered by the compound interest."

not sure i understand but the success story is interesting

Reply


ragnarok20 May 26 2012, 20:42:12 UTC
In what ways would this be superior to the use of a gold standard?

Reply

tcpip May 26 2012, 22:40:36 UTC
Almost anything is superior to the gold standard.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up