There's a pattern to my PJ film preferences: 1 = favorite, strong film but I can see where narrative decisions will come back to haunt later, 3 = better than the middle installment by a good margin, 2 = mmm...some good things, but overall not a strong installment.
Things I liked:
(
The list... )
Comments 4
I feel quite similarly about both PJ trilogies. Which is...interesting, being that the original Star Wars trilogy taught me as a kid that the middle film ought to be the best.
I really liked Azog, as a character. A pity he was so terribly (both as an intensifier and as a value judgment) digital, execution-wise.
Reply
I wish I could like him better as a villain, but then, too, the dialogue gets to me. Other than generalship, he mostly just says stuff like 'drink their blood', 'kill them all', etc. It's the villain analogue of Captain Obvious Legolas, to me, and so I mostly find it hard to get into him. I appreciated Lurtz because he didn't really say anything - he just strutted around and killed stuff, per orders.
Reply
Ah shit, it's true. Dammit, Dwim, there you go disrupting my appreciation of superficial appearances of bad-assery with your grasp of reality. I was too busy going "dude must just jam that thing right into his forearm after pulling the hook thing out, dude is badASS!"
Other than generalship, he mostly just says stuff like 'drink their blood', 'kill them all', etc
I attributed it to the conlang crew not having much source material to work with (which, in the case of Legolas, offers no excuse) and managed to pretend in my head that Azog must actually be much more verbose. X)
I appreciated Lurtz because he didn't really say anything - he just strutted around and killed stuff, per orders.
Lurtz's CV:
"Skills: strutting; killing stuff; following orders."
Reply
If you don't have the link to it, either reply here or e-mail me at Yahoo.com. (The part before the @ is just my nick here.) I'm not linking it in this comment because LJ tends to think it's spam for some reason.
Thanks!
Reply
Leave a comment