Leave a comment

Comments 9

(The comment has been removed)

dukexmachismo October 26 2006, 13:32:56 UTC
Not to mention all those busy vampire slayers out there...

I guess he chose assumptions to support his conclusion.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

funsocaltiger October 26 2006, 17:43:32 UTC
I prove vampires exist because I assume that if vampires existed they would never let me see them, and I have never seen one.

Reply


dirty_deeds October 26 2006, 16:34:55 UTC
Yes, vampires are only impossible mathematically.

Reply

dukexmachismo October 26 2006, 18:01:00 UTC
All the mathemeticians I know avoid sunlight. Kinda makes ya wonder.

Reply


funsocaltiger October 26 2006, 17:42:30 UTC
That's retarded. His assumptions are also based on an interetation of the actual legend which is flawed. Per the Buffy/Angel/Whedon vampireslayerverse, Vampires do not change all their victims into vampires; they are chosen very selectively. I believe Anne Rice's popular vampire model is similar as well. Not to mention vampires do not have to kill their prey to feed, either.

His model also doesn't take into account the possibility of relatively high mortality vampires themselves would presumably have. Not to mention the integration of any type of self-governing population model (population vs. food supply).

Reply


Maybe not gwendally October 26 2006, 21:21:18 UTC
I was just reading an article today on prions that talked about how the disease was sort of vampiric: you eat the brains of someone infected by prions and you, too, become undead (for a little while, then you get just plain dead, and then your friends and neighbors eat your brain and THEY become undead and the happy circle of Kuru continues.)

Reply


Great! anonymous February 23 2007, 23:15:44 UTC
Hi! Author, I think completely the same!
And just cool diz, interesting site name dukexmachismo.livejournal.com :), I see you you're are not newbe. Go on with the nice work!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up