Okay. I realise that the module Statistical Physics and Entropy is about making assumptions and working with statistics, but I think our most recent assessed question is taking the piss. Here, I quote:
Make a fully reasoned order of magnitude estimate of the number of molecules from Julius Caesar's last breath which were also present in your
(
Read more... )
Comments 9
Won't it be something like x molecules in caesar's last breath. Y molecules in the atmosphere...
Then if your breath is z (Which is close to x, so call it x) you get (x^2) /(Y)... as something... It's been so long (16 years?) since I last did anything like this!!!
Fuck knows what I'm talking about!!!!!
Reply
The only difference being that I haven't chosen to include my own lung capacity at the end. I've simply left it as the number of molecules he exhaled compared to the number of molecules in the whole atmosphere. Otherwise I would probably have to start dealing with permutations and I think I would end up with some scary numbers.
Reply
http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/archives/001392.html
The chance is apparently 98.8%.
My probability calculation was completely wrong... You have to look at every molecule and multiply the probabilities for each molecule together as they're unconnected events (Don't you have to use binomial theorem if the events are connected?) It's been 20 years since I did probabilities! God knows why e comes into it. I can't even remember why you use that sucker anymore!
My brain hurts at the moment. I've just been researching time travel and quantum phsyics/multiverse stuff for a short story... Which isn't really about time travel or quantum phsyics, but that stuff provides a nice McGuffin for me to play with.
And I'm listening to Tangerine Dream as well.
Reply
They have made the same assumptions I did (that in 2000 years the molecules distribute themselve across the whole atmosphere; no molecules absorbed by organisms or water etc.). However, as you inhale molecules, with each molecule slipping down the windpipe, you're altering the odds. Hence why I thought of permutations (choosing some number of objects/outcomes from the total available). Hmmm. I need sleep before I think this one through again.
What I've ended up with is the probability per molecule. Ugh. Dang. Sleep.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
I still think it's a naff question, considering it is assessed.
Reply
Leave a comment