Irrational Pet Peeve of the Day:
Every time I see someone asking a stupid question on Twitter, my gut reaction is to link them to
let me Google that for you. Sometimes I even wanna do it to myself.
Unimportant Pet Peeve of the Day:I *can't stand it* when people are vague about downloading crap online. You know, when someone writes stuff like "I'
(
Read more... )
Comments 23
(The comment has been removed)
[Back then there was a whole LOT of discrimination towards women in fandom who were either 'shipping or slashing characters -- because the then mainly male online fandom [oh IRC and Usenet, how much I DON'T miss you] thought those opinions were minor, less important than talking about the show's plot points.]
Last week, my sister was having this VERY SAME conversation online, about the Beatles -- she dared to criticize some songs and other fans pretty much told her she's not a real fan if she doesn't like every single Beatles song EVER. Huh, what?
start whining things like "Why can't you just enjoy it? It's only a TV show!" And I don't know about you, but it's that kind of whining that harshes my, squee,
OH GOD, YES, EXACTLY. Every time someone uses the "it's only a TV show" trope I feel like repeating myself and linking to this post I made awhile ago. Because telling us that is their way of ( ... )
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
OTOH, people are allowed to like whatever they like HOWEVER they like so, I *get* that my opinion of them is just that -- an opinion. But what I do when I think squee-only fandom is bugging me is I GET AWAY FROM IT, instead of telling them to stop hashing my meta.
PS: I meant to say it re: Radiohead, but the comment got too long and I forgot. Bolachas posted a bunch of Collector's Editions for their albums, just run a search and you'll find them [hopefully still available for download].
Reply
Reply
it's "when you put your characters together, make sure you have a fucking clue about what to do with their arcs afterward".
Oh yes, that's definitely something worth warning. What bugs me re: Moonlighting having become synonym to "coupledom ruins the show" is that they did it wrong and yet the excuse still gets used to this day and age.
My current favorite example of awesometastic follow-up on the will-they-won't-they trope is Charlie and Amita in Numbers. They spent a couple of seasons doing the UST thing, then they got together and will you look a that -- their relationship developed very organically, they had their ups and downs and doubts and even some ( ... )
Reply
Hah, I've JUST did that. The stupid question, I mean. On my defense, I don't do "looking up fandom related things in Google" very well.
And re. Moonlighting, someone posted this link in my FL yesterday (I think it was alethialia), and I thought it was very good on calling bullshit. Everybody with a preconceived notion that gen is the way to go otherwise it will kill the show should read that.
[Edited because oh, wow, pea-sized brain. ]
Reply
What I've been doing lately with the stupid questions is I either completely ignore them or I'm obnoxious about it and link to Wikipedia.
Everybody with a preconceived notion that gen is the way to go otherwise it will kill the show should read that.
I did stop watching both House and CSI: Motherboard mostly because the romantic storylines annoyed me, so I get being Gen. But that doesn't mean I think the coupledom storylines are not valid or that the 'shipping fans are OMGWRONG -- which is the feeling I get from most Gen people [especially XF and SG-1 Gen people. GOD, the entitlement!]
Reply
And I get choosing gen, but the reason for that choice should not be "otherwise couples will kill the show". Couples don't kill the show, writing does. I'm just saying.
Reply
Which is why the stupid questions bug me -- I did the work for myself, why can't other people? And I know it's not people's intention AT ALL, but to me? Passively sitting there waiting for someone to explain things to you that you could easily find yourself? It reeks of entitlement.
[And I say that while totally admitting I do it myself sometimes, but thankfully for me, usually my common sense kicks in 2 minutes later if no one answers me -- and I'll look for it myself instead.]
Reply
*sigh* I just want to pat them on the head, hand them a cookie, and tell them to go write their fanfic and be secure in the that they haven't fooled anyone, and, not to worry, their squee won't be harshed by someone daring to critique the thing they're squeeful about. Unfortunately, every time I express that opinion, I get apologists telling me that it's really NOT LIKE THAT, and the posters DON'T MEAN that their squee is harshed, not REALLY.
Reply
OH MAN, you are SO TOTALLY right! I was thinking more along the lines of people feeling obligated to their fandoms/flists thus following the discussion, but your take is definitely better -- A LOT of these posts sound exactly like that.
I'm always looking for harsh meta on the stuff I squee about, because I want to watch my entertainment without the rose colored glasses. And sometimes it IS a struggle to keep watching [oh, hi, SGA], but I've come to realize that I'd rather be mad/sick/furious at a TV episode than to not notice the problems it has.
Reply
It's not even the whole tiring aspect of hearing the SAME old justifications again and again, it's the self-righteous ranting. GO AWAY.
Reply
Reply
That said, thanks for the links. They ARE actually quite excellent. Despite the crazy people attracted to them.
Reply
But really -- I watched last night's SPN with this letter in mind and you know what? It made the viewing so much more fulfilling that it made all of the difference in my liking of the episode [and I did like it a lot].
Reply
Leave a comment