Leave a comment

Comments 13

khirainshambles November 30 2009, 23:32:08 UTC
Video works fine for me. :) On FB AND on my phone. :D

Those pictures are gorgeous. I am thoroughly jealous that you got to go to the Natural History museum.

Reply

drderange November 30 2009, 23:33:48 UTC
Well, if you guys come and visit before the exhibit leaves sometime around January 20th... :D

Reply

drderange December 1 2009, 00:16:14 UTC
Exhibit closes on January 31st. I'm taking you guys to see it. mmk? :D

Reply

khirainshambles December 1 2009, 01:56:16 UTC
If we can swing it, hell yes!

Reply


ferahgo December 1 2009, 00:07:35 UTC
:o Those are awesome photos. I am in love with the feathered dinosaur models.

Reply

drderange December 1 2009, 00:15:10 UTC
Thanks! I was in absolute awe when I saw that recreation. It was so pretty. :')

Like I told Khira, if you guys come and visit before the exhibit closes on January 31 (just checked it, lawl), I'll totally take you kids to see it! I can show you our local collection of hominins and stuff!

Reply


cayro_dein December 1 2009, 08:54:13 UTC
Those models look very familiar. I think I saw them when they were at the American Museum of Natural History in 2005. (Except for the Mei Long one, since that animal hadn’t been described yet at that point.)

I’ve got a couple questions about these pictures:

1: What genus of dromaeosaurid is that in the first picture? I’m thinking it might be Bambiraptor, but I can’t tell for sure.

2: Is that a cast of Microraptor gui, or is it the real fossil?

Reply

drderange December 1 2009, 13:54:44 UTC
It wouldn't surprise me if you did, since to the best of my knowledge it's been traveling for quite a while. To answer your questions, yes that is Bambiraptor, and I believe it's the real fossil since it was behind a heavy glass case and most of the casts were not.

Reply

cayro_dein December 2 2009, 00:26:27 UTC
That’s a pretty good photograph of the fossil. Now that I know it’s of the original, I have two other questions:

1: Do you have a higher resolution version of this image?

2: If you do, would you mind me using it in the evolution book that Ferahgo, Keesey and I are working on? (I’d give you credit for it if I do.) My current plan is to use the photograph of it that was published in the fossil’s 2003 description in the journal Nature, but it would be helpful to have a backup option just in case I can’t get the journal’s permission to republish their photograph.

Reply

drderange December 2 2009, 03:50:37 UTC
I do, and I would not mind. I have to double check that it is the actual fossil first, but I'm planning on going back at least once more before the exhibit leaves at the end of January so I can check then.

As for the higher resolution image, the original is 3872x2592. The quality is not as good as it could be since the lighting was low, but it isn't bad.

Reply


elsterfeder December 1 2009, 11:54:35 UTC
Seems to be a very nice exhibition :)

The first one, upper picture, it looks a bit like the sceleton is dancing some ballet style!
Must be my brain >_>,

Reply

drderange December 1 2009, 13:56:57 UTC
Oh, it was beautiful! I'm definitely going to go back and see it before it closes. And it kind of does, so it's not you. :)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up