[locked from children]

[ton_elloran]

Hokh'Ton Karakael and I recently were embroiled in an argument, for which I believe this community may be better able to give an answer.

Comments

[material_guy]

This community has a death obsession that's got me and a buddy thinkin' this place is full of closest necrophiliacs, so you might get some skewed answers, or maybe that's just a reflection of which is more "normal" outtah the two...

[ton_elloran]

I see. However skewed the results, the answers will still be interesting. Though it is odd to me that one would need to "be in the closet" about such things.

[material_guy]

If you fuck a corpse, they're dead, it's not like it's hurting anyone. And if your mom and you really wanna go at it, you got all the functioning parts, right? Neither's that bad. Now, fucked up and weird, on the other hand...

[ton_elloran]

Interesting. So there are no places on your world where either is common?

[Anon - Text]

[trips_andfalls]

I would say that necrophilia is worse.

Re: [Anon - Text]

[ton_elloran]

Why?

[Anon - Text]

[trips_andfalls]

People say incest is wrong, but that's mostly because of the possible problems that would happen if you had children. Necrophilia is disrespectful to the dead, and also, you're having sex with a rotting corpse, which is disgusting on an entirely different level.

Re: [Anon - Text]

[ton_elloran]

Ah. I had forgotten embalming was still a young art in your time. So in that sense, I suppose Necrophilia would be quite disturbing. In an incestuous relationship there would be less of a sanitation issue.

[phoenix_temple]

I believe it would depend on the degree of incest, honestly. Simply because there is the chance of reproduction which could lead to genetic defect. Plus it physically affects more living people than necrophilia.

[ton_elloran]

So incest between siblings is uncommon?

[phoenix_temple]

Fairly, yes. Most of us are raised understanding that it is somewhat dangerous.

[ton_elloran]

If sterility was common, would it still be an issue?

[delilahs_reaper]

Incest. With necrophilia, there's no chance of creating deformed children as a result.

[Guess whose mortal enemy is the product of incest and who is sort of carrying on an affair with the corpse he raised from the dead? THIS GUY.]

[ton_elloran]

So it is the danger of reproduction that makes incest so wrong?

[delilahs_reaper]

I won't sit in judgement on whether or not either is wrong, but incest would seem to have the greater capacity for bad consequences.

[ton_elloran]

From what I understand of science on Earth, that would make sense. Still, incest seems far more natural to me.

[grancenturio]

As a necromancer, I am one in the best position for necrophilia, and even I am somewhat leery of it. I try to use corpses for better reasons than that, since the souls are sometimes still attached. Incest has a higher likelihood of being consensual for both parties.

[ton_elloran]

I see. So the important part is consent to you?

[grancenturio]

If you plan to make it a moral argument, then consent would seem to be the key factor.

[ton_elloran]

Oh? There are some moral systems where consent is secondary.