Comments | dot_poly_snark: breakup?

reyl in dot_poly_snark

breakup?

Jan 13, 2009 22:35

You keep using that word...

If you are still living together and still having sex and still trying to talk about your feelings YOU AREN'T BROKEN UP. You are in a horrible relationship and possibly the cause of a drama hurricane.

But as you wish.

private war public place, repeat offenders, ls_anangel, i hart bad speling n gramr, op comments in snark - more lulz, trainwreck poly, clupervious, poly means many bad relationships, triad

Comments 51

leora January 14 2009, 03:46:29 UTC

Oh if we're going to discuss word misuse can we talk about "theirselves". Also "alot" and "shes" caught my attention before I stopped reading.

Sometimes you need a couple's counselor and an editor.

noveldevice January 14 2009, 03:58:49 UTC

Sometimes you need a couple's counselor and an editor. swift kick in the pants.

Fixed that for ya.

leora January 14 2009, 04:01:41 UTC

Oh thank you. I can always use some free editing. I'm only so-so at editing.

noveldevice January 14 2009, 04:03:00 UTC

...I can't tell if you're seriously miffed or not. I was attempting to be funny.

Thread 22

red_girl_42 January 14 2009, 04:11:43 UTC

Nicely executed snark! And I want to invent a cocktail called the "drama hurricane."

embryomystic January 14 2009, 05:05:05 UTC

Maybe you could work some llama's milk in there somewhere.

hobbitbabe January 16 2009, 03:00:24 UTC

Hee.

kshandra January 14 2009, 04:20:54 UTC

But as you wish.

I saw that comment in combination with your icon and began fervently praying that you didn't, in fact, love this turnip.

reyl January 14 2009, 11:56:54 UTC

Only in a shadenfreude sort of way. I mean, they did give me something to snark >:)

I actually feel really really bad for this trio. They clearly have serious problems and don't have two clues to rub together. I hope they get help.

cinema_babe January 14 2009, 05:03:34 UTC

Why am I not surprised that this clusterfuck is back? Could it be because one of her GFs posted this just a little while ago? When I saw that I had a feeling that more post would follow.

I can't imagine this merry dance ending without a lot of people ending up even more fucked up than they already are.

jthinktoomuch January 14 2009, 05:34:14 UTC

You imply that more fucked up is possible.
It boggles the mind.

tehuti January 14 2009, 06:30:36 UTC

More fucked up is ALWAYS possible.

They could add another victim partner, or worse, a baby!

sparkymonster January 14 2009, 15:37:04 UTC

I think there is already a baby involved.

Thread 16

cuddlycthulhu January 14 2009, 15:44:35 UTC

A bunch of us meanies are asking how, exactly, they're broken up. I'm wondering if we'll get a "YOU JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND!" flounce.

icecreamempress January 14 2009, 16:26:59 UTC

No, s/he (I don't remember which pronoun the poster prefers) usually tries to explain. I don't think the poster is trying to be a drama llama--I think that it's more a case of someone with very few resources working things out in the entirely wrong forum. So although I'm amused by the constant trainwreckiness, I actually have some good will for these folks, because I think it's cluelessness rather than entitlement that's at the heart of their problems.

cuddlycthulhu January 14 2009, 16:32:51 UTC

I think what's actually at the heart of the problem is that none of them are willing to actually let go. Seriously. I understand that it might be hard for them to do (one of them has a kid, right? I can't remember if this is the same broken triad as the one who posted a few months ago), but that's their main issue. None of them can get any fucking distance to get some clarity or seem to really want to. Sometimes relationships just end and they don't seem to want to actually recognize that.

00goddess January 14 2009, 23:22:51 UTC

Agreed.