WHAT?! People don't like my snark?!

[cuddlycthulhu]

I know, I'll give context missing from my original post, fail at math, and generally flail miserably at the screen in a petulant manner!

That'll show him!

-Ren

Comments

[friend_of_tofu]

What is it with the steady trickle of bad-tempered failed snarkers we've been getting on here over the past few months?

When will people learn, laconic rudeness + weak references to other people's humour != snark, dammit!!

[tandu]

I believe the correct equation is:

Stupid post elsewhere + witty observational remark = snark

But then, I failed Differential Snark Equations in College. It wasn't my fault. You can't flail at paper quite as well as you can at a screen.

[friend_of_tofu]

Oh, I didn't even get to differential, I couldn't manage snark fractions;

"If I have 2/3 of an HBB, add 7/12s disgruntled primary and subtract 1/4 suspicious co-workers, what am I left with?"

[cuddlycthulhu]

A headache?

[tgeller]

Private war + public place = snarkable, != snark.

I'm looking at you, cuddlycthulhu.

[cuddlycthulhu]

Eh, was going for the metasnark.

Do I at least get the bronze?

[signsoflife]

You get the "worst finish possible". . . fourth place.

[cuddlycthulhu]

No!!! Now how will I feed my family!!! I shall have to kill myself for the dishonor.

/wrists

[zzyzx_xyzzy]

That thread, apparently, had too much dumb to fit in just one post on my fpage.

[babasyzygy]

Perhaps the community should have an extra strong warning that simply being angry isn't enough, and just thinking that you're clever doesn't make up for not being on-topic.

[cuddlycthulhu]

I'd be honestly surprised if this got a flounce.

[friend_of_tofu]

Keep trying, dude, keep trying.

[cuddlycthulhu]

But if they flounce, then we don't get as much snark!