Considering some of the things I've read in his journal, especially concerning armed rebellion against the government, I can't be entirely sure. I do know others have said there are extenuating circumstances (read: he has some issue due to which we shouldn't question his social skills) so perhaps there really is no cause for concern.
That said, I'm often grateful that he's on the other coast.
He's an activist for people with Asperger's, if that's what you mean.
Now, I don't judge him for that. I do judge him for his narcissism and now for his apparent belief that physical violence is a fine way to deal with relationship conflict.
I'm not judging him for that, either; I'm saying others have put it forth as an explanation for why he might not see how creepy all those invites over for dinner might seem.
I strongly suspect that he didn't think out the ramifications of his comment or how people might react; I'm guessing he meant it in terms of the "state" trying to stop him from doing something.
On the other hand, once posted, a comment often takes on a life of its own and one has to be prepared for that.
Actually, I know Joel and a violent physical response from him would probably look like throwing his hands up in the air, screaming "why meeeee" and slamming the door as he left the room.
He's a good guy. Just incredibly intense and direct.
And that kind of walking-out-slamming-the-door crap would *not* convince me that the person in question was a "good guy". Anything but. Again, it would be red-flag behaviour.
Why do I always associate the phrase "He's a good guy, but..." with the phrase "I'm not racist/sexist/homophobic/etc but..."? Oh, I remember now - because they almost invariably seem to be used to defend indefensible behaviour.
He'd be doing more to dispel other people's sense of him as a violent person if he were explaining that he had miscommunicated, instead of berating everyone else for our deficiencies in reading and understanding. Because, of course, HE'S right and the rest of us are just putting straw-men in his mouth, blah, blah.
Of course not! I mean, no-one ever said about a serial killer, "But he's such a good guy, so quiet, so helpful, so friendly, and he really loves children/animals/humanity", did they?
NB: This is also humour, for any readers uncertain...
Comments 92
That said, I'm often grateful that he's on the other coast.
Reply
Now, I don't judge him for that. I do judge him for his narcissism and now for his apparent belief that physical violence is a fine way to deal with relationship conflict.
Also, he just creeps me the fuck out.
Reply
Reply
I strongly suspect that he didn't think out the ramifications of his comment or how people might react; I'm guessing he meant it in terms of the "state" trying to stop him from doing something.
On the other hand, once posted, a comment often takes on a life of its own and one has to be prepared for that.
Reply
Reply
He's a good guy. Just incredibly intense and direct.
Reply
Reply
Reply
And that kind of walking-out-slamming-the-door crap would *not* convince me that the person in question was a "good guy". Anything but. Again, it would be red-flag behaviour.
Why do I always associate the phrase "He's a good guy, but..." with the phrase "I'm not racist/sexist/homophobic/etc but..."? Oh, I remember now - because they almost invariably seem to be used to defend indefensible behaviour.
I just bet he's a Nice Guy™.
Reply
Reply
The more he "explains" the more I'm thinking barrels in the back yard.
Reply
Reply
NB: This is also humour, for any readers uncertain...
Reply
Leave a comment