So this big bang..

Apr 25, 2011 17:02

will it all be explained?

"Fuller also wrote that the episode's solutions were "rather paradoxical in nature [since the Doctor] only escapes as Rory lets him out once given the means to do so by the Doctor travelling back in time once he's escaped.", though Martin in The Guardian excused this paradox due to the episode being set "in the eye of the storm as history collapses [and so] ... hardly working to the same rulebook"."

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Big_Bang_%28Doctor_Who%29

Does this quote suggest that Moffat has no intentions of answering the obvious paradox of the pandorica?

Anyone heard anything either way?

It'd be a real shame if it weren't resolved. I've really enjoyed Moffat's writing so far and Sherlock was an added delight, but i'm also growing a bit wary of his reliance on plot devices. Now we have the silence, which you can't remember after you've seen it, then we had the weeping angles that won't move if you're looking at them and before that we had more than a few instances of "the perception filter".

Are they all related, or is that just his off the shelf way of building suspense?

speculation

Previous post Next post
Up