Exorcising by Vote

Nov 02, 2006 14:20

In a previous post, I suggested that if you really oppose the President's positions, then you really have no choice but to vote Democratic this November. Anything else, an unrealistic, idealist vote for a third party, except possibly where the Democrat has a wide and comfortable margin would be throwing your vote away. My comments were intended to ( Read more... )

war on terror, 2006, bill richardson, iraq, elections, congress, new mexico

Leave a comment

Comments 4

physicsguy November 2 2006, 21:58:15 UTC
I live in the NM 1st District. This election is a prime example of why I don't vote. I don't want to choose between an idiotic, lame lawyer and a corrupt, lying Bush lapdog to represent me. Neither one would.

Reply

discreet_chaos November 3 2006, 10:07:50 UTC
I'm glad that I don't have to make the choice.

Patricia Madrid seems to be an ineffective idiot, but though I oppose most of the President's policies, I'd hate to give him even the slightest endorsement. Though, if the Democrats were to take control of the House without Ms Madrid, then Heather Wilson would have significantly less power, so she'd be a little less threatening than she is in the majority.

Steve Pierce is going to win down here, but thankfully, I have no real qualms with Rev Kissling.

Reply

discreet_chaos November 3 2006, 10:17:21 UTC
I guess that last line should've said "and thankfully" because in this case, of course I am supporting the Democrat because though Rev Kissling doesn't have a chance and hasn't really run much of a campaign, Steve Pierce stands for most everything that I'm against.

Reply


nokuren November 5 2006, 19:25:39 UTC
Oh, god. I can't wait for Wilson to just die. Every single time she's up for re-election, it's a filthy, dirty campaign on both sides. Not as bad as some commercials I've seen on the internet, but still pretty bad.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up