Being feminist

Jun 29, 2007 08:10

Yoder et al (2007) add to a growing body of literature suggesting that identifying as a feminist is good for women. Yoder measured feminist identity using five subscales identified by Fischer et al (2000). Quoting from Yoder et al (p 3-4):
  • passive acceptance (“I don’t see much point in questioning the general expectation that men should be ( Read more... )

feminism, politics, miriam liss, ann fischer, sexism, nancy hansen, identity, laura ramsey, janice yoder

Leave a comment

Comments 8

beckiemoriello June 29 2007, 13:53:49 UTC
whether there was any difference in feminist identification by social class

My English ex-girlfriend was getting her MA in working class feminist literature. She said that there's extremely little because feminism is mostly restricted to the middle and upper classes.

This was in 2001 in Brighton. Her name's Heather Pugh. *shrug*

Reply


charlycrash June 29 2007, 15:49:11 UTC
The first link doesn't seem to be working for me.

Reply

differenceblog June 29 2007, 21:58:54 UTC
D'oh. I'm working from a computer without institutional certificates now. is Yoder et al (2007) accessible?

Reply

charlycrash June 30 2007, 06:49:22 UTC
It is :)

Btw, damn good show, keep up the good work, dude.

Reply

differenceblog June 30 2007, 16:10:22 UTC
thanks!

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

beaconeer June 30 2007, 03:33:41 UTC
maybe its regional, but here in rural New England gender roles are certainly being re-defined but not for the better for women. At the age where people traditionally are settling in there's a growing expectation that men will stay juvenile and girls have to be grown ups before they've had a chance to be kids. This is a completely unscientific observation.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up