I don't usually gakk stuff -- but then, when you come right down to it, I don't usually post -- but
this bit of
ponygirl2000's is too good to pass up. Though I tend to denigrate the conspiratorial mindset, I have to admit that the possibilities of historical figures having met under strange circumstances sends my mind to some interesting spaces. The fact that
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
I wanted to include Aphra Behn on my team too, but I tossed her aside for a little Ewan-inspired eye candy. I am that shallow.
What is this "gakk"? I've had grok explained to me, in great detail, but gakk just makes me think yak, which is off-putting due to some personal issues I have with Asian oxen type creatures.
Reply
I have learned more history from kick-ass action/adventure stories than from most sources, which presents me with a certain, how should I say, Dumasian view of history, i.e., inaccurate. I continue to think of Catherine de Medicis as an evil old poisoner with occult tendencies. On the other hand, I know more about the Valois than is really necessary. (I am, however, disappointed that Dumas did not continue the story of Chicot the Jester and The Forty-Five through the murders in Henri III's Blois bedchambers of the Duc de Guise and his brother, the Cardinal of Lorraine, and the subsequent ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
This has given me some ideas. How about Shakespeare's fictitious characters?
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment