In case you were wondering, I'm suggesting that "resistance" is equivalent here to "testicles"

[dherblay]

Today's second-best revealingly unintentional double-entendre comes, via ponygirl2000, from The Guardian's article on the new Whedon-less Buffy, where some trade paper editor opines, "Warner [Bros.] know[s] that people have an appetite for revamps."

Today's best revealingly unintentional double-entendre is the kicker to Michael Kinsley's opinion piece

Comments

[scrollgirl]

In case you were wondering, I'm suggesting that "resistance" is equivalent here to "testicles"

Heh. That's pretty much how I interpreted it as well. IMHO, the people who do have balls are the ones protesting the new TSA procedures.

[dlgood]

They've got even more balls than you know. A large component of the people now protesting the TSA policies are the same folks who vocally supported the USA Patriot Act. And when ACLU and other civil liberties groups objected to it, accused them with sympathizing with the terrorists. A lot of the objection to overreach corresponds conveniently with now being out of power.

[scrollgirl]

Oh, seriously? I did not know this. That's just really frustrating. And hypocritical. I mean, it'd be one thing if I could believe they just saw the error of their ways, but if it'd been Bush making these changes I doubt they'd be objecting quite so vigorously.