Last night, thanks to Clue suggested by
syntonic_comma,
I was able to work out the rhythm notation problem that was keeping me
from writing down the tune I'd come up with over the weekend. (And as
I predicted when I first complained about being stumped, it turns out
to look easy and obvious once it's finally written down.) Since
anniemal suggested that it might fit
(
Read more... )
Comments 9
The other way, the beats get lost.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Even without modifying the As, though, I'd take the 12/8. I'm used to playing medieval & renaissance music without bar lines; I can read straight note values and not get confused.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
And yes, if it's triplet-oriented stuff I'd tend to go with 12/8 myself.
Reply
It's quite explicitly and deliberately not the editorial convention in scholarly modern-notation editions of Renaissance and earlier music, where ties within the measure are eschewed, resulting in measures which does look precisely like the 12/8 example. Those of us who work a lot in early music are really used to reading highly syncopated music notated without ties. Which is presumably where dglenn's head was at when he came up with that option. :) (Hey, dglenn, you got your period on your score[*]!)
[* I suppose that just something you risk notating mensural music...]
Reply
Leave a comment