Thanks! Here on LJ, you and I seem to be the main enthusiasts of Flickr -- me somewhat against my better judgment. I loathe their corporate penchant for censorship -- not least requiring SELF censorship by their members.
Having hit heads with them, I don't mind them saying, "This one needs to be moderate or that one needs to be restricted," what ticks me off is them saying, "Somewhere you have something that we consider incorrectly tagged and we're making all of your photos restricted until you figure out which one it is and fix it."
I just uploaded a ton of shots from the Denver Zombie Crawl but after that there are a lot of portraits.
My views started to go up when I heard London Andrews was coming to DC and I arranged a (Paid) photo session with her and I began posting them. Most of my other portraits are friends and I'm a bit more careful about how much I post of them.
Comments 6
Reply
Reply
That said, I'm noticing more and more members -- like De Fonk here -- are posting what they damn please. I happily wandered through his (her?) collection, and particularly liked this one: https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonkde/23976250206/in/faves-27942387@N08/
ps I just clicked on one of the commenters on De Fonk, the intriguingly named "rock 'n Lola" who is even more provocative -- https://www.flickr.com/photos/57121026@N07/23376113053/in/photostream/
Reply
I'm more careful now, but I've had it happen 3 or 4 times so far.
Feel free to wander about in my stuff: https://www.flickr.com/photos/grail76
I just uploaded a ton of shots from the Denver Zombie Crawl but after that there are a lot of portraits.
My views started to go up when I heard London Andrews was coming to DC and I arranged a (Paid) photo session with her and I began posting them. Most of my other portraits are friends and I'm a bit more careful about how much I post of them.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment