I posted a week ago about the car chase/foot pursuit caper. Well, I got some more info on the guy and everything is starting to make a lot more sense. Turns out he is a 2-striker and it is not impossible that he will get his 3rd based on the events of the chase. I also spoke with the red light camera guy (he blew one of the lights that takes your
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
- Solar energy is so abundant. To not want to try to harness as much as possible is a gigantron waste.
- It is clean.
- It is intuitively the most logical kind of energy we could choose to rely on.
- Its development could engender a whole family of neologisms that begin with helio- (cool).
- Its mainstreaming could engender a wave of sci-fi wherein astronauts travel to Mercury and Mars to plant solar cells in their soil... which ultimately backfires (cool).
I am so ready to get off work, by the way.
Reply
As for hydrogen, I was not aware of the points that you made, but I must claim ignorance other than the pitch, which of course sounds good. I read about a compressed air-powered car in India. And there's always recharging your electrical car with your wind/dam/nuclear-supplied energy at home.
At the electronics convention in Vegas, they had a solar charger that you could plug your various appliances into and which holsd a charge for 10 hours. That's cool.
Reply
Reply
"I expect the car to have about 45 mpg... The main way which the car conserves gas is that it turns the engine off when idle, so the mpg is a lot higher in city driving where there are frequent stops. Highway driving, I feel, is not any better mpg than a non-hybrid version."
[an e-mail response from Stephen to my question about his car.]
I knew it had to be much greater than 33 mpg! But yes, it seems that highway driving winnows the difference in mileage, especially if you're still going 75-100 mph. My car gets up to 41 mpg (I achieved 40 mpg on a tank, once), but usually it hovers around 34-36 because I commute on surface streets.
Sorry, this was somewhat irrelevant to your post.
Reply
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/08/science/earth/08wbiofuels.html
Reply
Leave a comment