**NOTE: I know that I haven't really updated twice this week, but right now i have lots of work, and since this blog is not the first thing in my personal project list, Im going to start updating just once each week. Just for one month, after the 15 of July I'm planning to return to posting twice a week. Thanks /NOTE**
Yeah, this post it's going to
(
Read more... )
Comments 2
As put by someone in the starcity forums:
4 Gush
4 Brainstorm
4 Ponder
4 Oath
and
4 Gush
4 Brainstorm
4 Ponder
4 Flash
doesn't really sound like different decks at all. The truth is, they don't play very different either.
Are the restrictions stupid? Up to a point yes, but they are done with a valid reason in mind: Get the metagame more diverse. They don't stop being stupid, and if I played Vintage, I would feel a little cheated, not by this restriction, but by thinking in what future restrictions may show.
Reply
Así que como wizards quiere ver los mismos cambios en el hermano mayor, pero es vintage, se supone que lo juegas porque ya te gastaste un buen de lana, lo menos que quieres hacer es probar cambios, estoy seguro que es de las razones principales por las cuales estás jugando vintage.
En cambio legacy todavía es un formato joven, aunque ya se están viendo cartas que se usan en varios decks (tarmagoyf pasa al fondo... corriendo de un fow), pero no hay un decy dominante en si, cuando lo haya y tenga un set de cartas que se empiecen a usar en varios decks pues entonces nos estaremos quejando y ranteando al respecto todos los jugadores de legacy.
Reply
Leave a comment