So Scalzi is
talking about commas, which warms my cold copyeditor heart. I still vividly remember my first months (okay, all 41 months) copyediting for a company that published tax treatises, where my mantra was "I have no idea what it means, but the commas are in the right place." I even, I wouldn't say mastered, as no one masters the semicolon
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
I know some of the core grammar rules of comma useage but I think I break a lot of them (except for the comma splice rule - that one is never to be broken) for the sake of pacing and rhythm, as the author of that blog stated. I have a great appreciation for the core grammar rules but I also feel that strictly adhering to them for the sake of keeping to the rules sometimes alters the text or "voice" of a writing.
Reply
The serial comma is the one that comes before the "and" in a group of three or more things. Thus, in the sentence "I ate, cereal, bananas, and blueberries for breakfast." the comma between "bananas" and "and" is the serial comma. Now, in a sentence like this, it might not seem terribly important. But I was recently reminded of (I think it was makinglightTheresa Nielsen-Hayden's) example proving the serial commas supreme importance. The hypothetical dedication in a book: "I'd like to thank my parents, God, and Ayn Rand." Go on, I dare you to read that sentence without the serial comma and see if it says the same thing. I dare you.
That is the serial comma.
Reply
I usually use this, that, and the other as my example. One of my friends explains it as Rice Krispies, Cheerios, and Wheat Chex.
The title Eats, Shoots and Leaves is another good example of Serial Comma Confusion(tm).
Reply
Your example is a perfect reason why.
Reply
Hee hee. It's also the fount of all that nifty stuff.
Reply
This is true.
It's the fount and the font. It's very talented that way.
Reply
Leave a comment