The discussion I saw happened in exactly the order given on the poll - and, as far as I could tell, the first option ("undies") was from an upper-class English woman. The second ("panties") was an American who protested that the first just sounded weird. Then came... someone from somewhere... with "isn't it knickers?" followed by a guy who said the first three were all far too feminine...
I've heard both "panties in a bunch" and "knickers in a twist" but I prefer the latter just because it seems like such a delightfully British phrase to me with my American sensibilities.
I've always hated the word "panties". It sounds far too cutesy and psuedo-sexy, and in my head, it suggests too-young girls in sexual contexts, and makes me very uncomfortable. I mean, older women don't wear "panties". If they do, they're trying to be younger than they are. "Panties" used in erotic fiction sounds cheap and grates.
Actually, the first time I really came across the word was reading thye scripts from the tv series of Monty Python's Flying Circus, where it got used frequently.
Comments 28
Reply
IMO, it's 'panties in a bunch'. I just used that at Whendonesque yesterday LOL.
But I've heard my UK friends say 'knickers in a twist'.
Reply
The discussion I saw happened in exactly the order given on the poll - and, as far as I could tell, the first option ("undies") was from an upper-class English woman. The second ("panties") was an American who protested that the first just sounded weird. Then came... someone from somewhere... with "isn't it knickers?" followed by a guy who said the first three were all far too feminine...
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
"Welcome to the Nancy Tribe."
Reply
I mean, older women don't wear "panties".
If they do, they're trying to be younger than they are.
"Panties" used in erotic fiction sounds cheap and grates.
< /taking it too seriously >
Reply
They're either "knickers" or "undies".
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment