[random comment from the peanut gallery, because I should be doing other, not very pleasant things--]
I like the 1st draft! The 2nd has a really powerful beginning but I think the 1st coheres much better & seems more heartfelt... The 2nd loses me at the Dunkin/Donuts line break.
Hmmm. The first was about many different people/things, and the final was about one person --- I'm not sure how the first could be more coherent. I look into the line breaks.
I just think the 1st has a lot of emotional energy!--& feels kind of natural somehow, so I didn't feel the need to try & make sense of it, I just enjoyed the mysteriousness. (And I also really like the way the 1st draft ends on "frown"--it leaves me with a sense of unsettled ambiguity--I think because there's no context that tells you for sure whether it's supposed to be a verb or a noun.)
I found a copy of "Children Having Trouble With Meat" at my friend's used bookstore on Friday night and bought it. It's so weird when the internet turns up in real life.
Hello, I've been following your poems a while now. I prefer the second version. The first seems more scattered and free-associative, the second has a more organized flow. Some of the images feel freer and more realized in the first, but only because there's less of a center to that poem. The mind drifts along at first but the end doesn't seem to relate to the beginning, the reader supplies as much as the writer. I like being more directed by my poems.
Comments 7
I like the 1st draft! The 2nd has a really powerful beginning but I think the 1st coheres much better & seems more heartfelt... The 2nd loses me at the Dunkin/Donuts line break.
Reply
Reply
Anyway, you're the poet, not me, so who knows! :)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment