I spent 20 minutes earlier this week filling out an online
MBTI, and today I went to Career Services on campus to review it with their resident expert, Liz K. (Free for staff; and mah boss has told me it's job-related and I shouldn't count it as personal time. ...But wait till she hears I'm going backIt was an entertaining hour, and I took a few
(
Read more... )
Comments 18
Reply
Reply
I've taken the MBTI at least three times over about 4 years. The results have varied somewhat, with the most significant shift being on the E-I scale: I'd moved from mid-range I to low-mid E. The MBTI, if memory serves, measures current, not innate, preferences. Your innate preferences are still there, but you can learn to make up for them. This seems to be what happened in my case -- who would have expected a solid I to have as customer-facing a job as Turnkey?
I got curious enough about the whole thing to take the MBTI Step II, a more in-depth evaluation. The most memorable result for me was on the same E-I scale. The Step II breaks each category down into a further five subcategories. Since the basic MBTI is an amalgamation of all five, you can get a case like mine: Mid- to low-range I on four of the five scales, and an off-the-chart E on one, skewing the entire thing to the E side. (off the chart Gregarious, I believe -- though I need to find the actual test result to verify this ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
...Guess so would the lawyers. ;)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment