M e s s a g e 1 0

Mar 05, 2010 01:04

This is all terribly confusing! There's something very fishy here, and it's not any kind of fish I ever saw. It's a confusing fish of a different name altogether. Like Bruce, or Isabelle, or Marzipan. Those aren't names for fishes at all!

Who are you all? Are you who you've been saying you've been being? Are you all some kind of fishes that have ( Read more... )

event

Leave a comment

Comments 29

alwaysaboom March 5 2010, 06:11:16 UTC
Don't tell me we're going to drown this time...

Reply

curiousher March 5 2010, 06:15:45 UTC
Now how on Earth would a fish drown? That's just silly!

Reply

alwaysaboom March 5 2010, 06:16:37 UTC
By being on land...

Reply

curiousher March 5 2010, 06:27:24 UTC
But that's not drowning, is it? That's something else, isn't it? Like suffomacation or something. Either way, you could just go back in the water, you know. I'm sure if you've made it this long without water, you can go another few feet to the ocean. Or the fountain. Or the pool, perhaps.

Reply


Eff, wrong Poland account! reckless_eagle March 5 2010, 10:06:09 UTC
...Dude? Have you like, been drinking? I'm totes not a fish.

Reply

To be fair, it was an awesome account name. <3 curiousher March 5 2010, 12:51:16 UTC
I've had plenty of tea, but I don't see how that makes a difference. Are fish not supposed to have tea?

And well, how should I know? You could be a fish. Fish are very sneaky like that.

Reply

Thank you bb <3 reckless_eagle March 5 2010, 14:55:37 UTC
[Just... wonders what she's been making the tea out of. The mushrooms you're not supposed to eat, possibly.]

I'm like, 450. I totes don't think I could go that long and not notice I was a fish. Wait, why are we even talking about this?

Reply

curiousher March 5 2010, 15:38:01 UTC
[Well, this is Wonderland. It's entirely possible.]

You could! I'm pretty old myself, so I would know. But maybe there's some kind of cut-off mark, like 200, or 365, or something.

Well, why not?

Reply


helena_campbell March 5 2010, 10:31:02 UTC
...Parrot fish look really nice. [Totally just playing along.]

Reply

curiousher March 5 2010, 13:03:57 UTC
[A+, Helena.] They do, don't they! I wonder if they like crackers? You know, like "Polly want a cracker?". Or if they caw like one?

I like clownfish, even if they don't look very much like clowns. That happens with a lot of fish, doesn't it?

Reply

helena_campbell March 5 2010, 13:23:38 UTC
Or maybe they know how to talk, like parrots. Maybe they just talk when we're not looking.

Yes, it does. Like how lionfish don't look anything like lions at all. Except maybe if you squint at them and imagine really hard.

Reply

curiousher March 5 2010, 13:42:06 UTC
Perhaps! Or maybe they all talk all the time, and we just don't hear them. They could be trying to tell us something!

No, they don't really. It takes quite a lot of imagine for them! Or even goldfish. They're not really gold at all! Most of them are orange, but even the ones that aren't still aren't the right color!

Reply


ooc talks_to_fish March 5 2010, 12:42:27 UTC
- Will they notice that they are in the wrong body?
- Will they remember themselves (as another person?)
- Is it necessary that the person has been at the mansion at one point, or can it be someone form their canon?

Reply

Re: ooc curiousher March 5 2010, 13:18:28 UTC
- Nope! They'll think they've always looked like that, even if it goes against what their hated person looks like.

- Yes, for the most part. It would lead to questions like "well, what would "you" look like (as another person)" though, and I think there's a lot of room for creative leeway there, since character relations are going to get so messed up this weekend anyway. Like, maybe they can't quite remember what they looked like, or maybe they looked like someone else all together.

- Nope, it can be someone from their canon, whether they've been to the mansion or not. Similarly, it could be someone in the mansion that isn't from their canon, if they've come to hate them that much.

I hope that helps? I just rolled out of bed, so I feel like I might be a little incoherent. ;;;

Reply

Re: ooc talks_to_fish March 5 2010, 13:43:15 UTC
No, thanks, it's good!

- Would they have the knowledge of the person that they hate? Because Jeb knows almost all the things that Angels wants to find out about... so... is it possible to have them leak that knowledge out to someone else, so other people can tell them about it afterwards?

Reply

Re: ooc curiousher March 5 2010, 14:05:50 UTC
- I'm going to say no on that one. I understand the reasoning behind it, and for people whose hated person isn't in the mansion it would be fine, but if we said it was okay for everyone, I think that would probably count as godmodding, which is generally considered not good. We can't really give the characters information they don't already have. It will probably wind up more like your character's impression of the person the hate. It also works out for characters that hate some one but don't know the "real" side of them. They won't magically know that information, they'll just be acting like how they would assume they would act. Does that make sense?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up