Dean and Castiel and homophobia

May 09, 2013 15:33

You know what's convincing me more than anything that the queer subtext in Supernatural is about to go canonically textual ( Read more... )

feminism, rant, glbt, dean/castiel, supernatural

Leave a comment

Comments 21

emma_in_oz May 9 2013, 11:39:43 UTC
Did Angel and Spike not canonically have a past not mentioned until season sixish? Of course, it was one line.

Reply

cupidsbow May 9 2013, 11:54:47 UTC
Personally, I'd count that as queer-baiting, as it wasn't followed up with anything consequential in what we saw onscreen. Other people's mileage may vary.

Reply


spn laceymcbain May 9 2013, 14:26:46 UTC
Well put. I forget sometimes (since I'm not as active in fandom) how loud and opinionated (and hateful) people can be about these things. I'm like you - I'd be happy either way. I just want there to continue to be a relationship to work on - one that's difficult and requires forgiveness and sometimes is based on faith because that's what real relationships/friendships are like (even when you aren't dying every second week or saving the world on Wednesdays.) I'm more interested in the dynamic and how complex it can be, and I really hope they let Dean understand his own role in Castiel's situation. Cas has been kind enough to remind Dean that he's not responsible for Cas's decisions; now maybe Dean needs to remind Cas that love and friendship are based in caring for the person even when they do something you don't agree with.

Reply

cupidsbow May 9 2013, 15:02:41 UTC
I actually want them to keep working on the Sam and Dean, and Sam and Cas relationships too, because all three are more interesting when they are working through stuff together. It's just all around more interesting when the show isn't focused around a twosome all the time.

I also want more Garth and Kevin and Charley. :)

But yes, a more complex and intimate relationship between Cas and Dean, whatever the flavour, would make me very happy. They are both so lonely, and I want to see how they go about making their connection better suit their needs.

Reply


amnisias May 9 2013, 18:49:25 UTC
For your list - Ellen Degeneres came out in season 4 of Ellen.

Reply

cupidsbow May 10 2013, 02:54:15 UTC
Thank you! I had wondered if Ellen fit the mould. I haven't seen it yet.

Reply


incidental_fire May 9 2013, 21:42:26 UTC
Another example of a character coming out mid-show is Kerry Weaver, on ER. She wasn't a main character, I'd say, but she was a regular cast member on the ensemble show. She had several on-screen relationships, one of which ended up involving a court case (her partner died, and the partner's parents took sole custody of their son), but the relationships were never with other regular cast members.

Reply

cupidsbow May 10 2013, 02:55:31 UTC
I'm really enjoying hearing about so many queer characters. It's reassuring; although most of them are still secondary characters and not a major focus. One day!

Reply


boogieshoes May 9 2013, 22:59:00 UTC
i'm still trying to comprehend the fact that there are anti-Dean/Cas folk, and the 'anti' is intense enough to to trigger feelings of hatred for the 'ship. actually, i've never understood how people can be that virulent about anything, pro *or* con. passionate, yes, and passionately coming up with reasons why a pairing 'can't be' - but virulent? dude, it's *fiction*. all cultural discussions aside, in the end, it's what we do in day-to-day life that's important, and fiction is our gravy, not our meat and potatoes.

that said, if Dean/Cas became canon, i'd be watching Supernatural with a completely surface-deep love of PRETTEH MENZ. because at that point, my libido kicks in, and it's all over but the hormones....

actually, i think my libido got me caught up in fandom, general, in the first place, so i'm right on track for this one....

-bs

Reply

cupidsbow May 10 2013, 02:57:56 UTC
Well, there's nothing wrong with joining the fandom for that reason. Hormones are important. I don't think we pay enough attention to our embodied experiences.

It's not the main reason I'm at the party, but it's not like I'm immune to a pretty face either. And to be fair, there is a lot of pretty in Supernatural.

Reply

boogieshoes May 10 2013, 17:48:15 UTC
i run about half-and-half 'horribly shallow' and 'thinky'. SPN is one of my 'horribly shallow' fandoms. i enjoy it for the horror stories and the plot line, and i'm not too worried about things hanging together or the STATEMENTS the characters can make. i know they can, and i'm delighted when other people decide to rampant!meta on SPN, but it's not my bag.

my 'thinky' fandoms tend to be Highlander, Sentinel, and Pretender. i don't interact much with any of them anymore, but long, deep discussions on what the characters do, say, and the text, subtext, and more-text there-on was awesome in those fandoms.

SPN isn't thinky for me - they jumped that particular shark when they implied that the Hindu Gods and Goddesses were pretty weak compared to the majority of Christian demons, who don't even rate *fallen angel* status, most of the time.

-bs

Reply

cupidsbow May 10 2013, 17:59:27 UTC
Yeah, the race politics on the show is pretty gross a lot of the time. It bothers me too.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up