Even-Handed NetFlix Reviews #17

Feb 13, 2011 20:47

Some old animation, some new live-action. Some pleasant surprises, some expected disappointments.

MULHOLLAND DRIVE: * * * )

movies, netflix

Leave a comment

Comments 16

kithrup February 14 2011, 06:00:56 UTC
I thought Iron Man 2 failed by being too much set-up for The Avengers.

I can't remember -- have you seen The Last Airbender (the original series, not the movie)? I also like both Fullmetal Alchemist serieses.

Reply

crisper February 14 2011, 06:53:57 UTC
Haven't seen it.

Reply

kithrup February 14 2011, 06:55:22 UTC
I recommend it. It took me about half of the first season to really get into it, but then I was hooked. I was very glad it was on Netflix streaming, 'cause I'd end up watching three or four episodes a night.

Reply

porphyre February 14 2011, 09:01:33 UTC
I second that. (Not the netflix bit, but how it hooks). It's entirely worth your time.

Reply


testing4l February 14 2011, 06:55:17 UTC
I thought for sure that association with zenomt would have forced The Hudsucker Proxy on you sooner.

I, too, have very fond memories from childhood of the magic duel in The Sword and the Stone. I guess those -- like The Black Cauldron -- may be memories best left unrevisited.

Reply


jorm February 14 2011, 07:24:03 UTC
I loved both Get Him to the Greek and Hot Tub Time Machine precisely because they're so goofy. I pretty much hated Iron Man 2.

Mullholland Drive lost me quickly and never recovered.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

jorm February 17 2011, 06:33:38 UTC
Thanks!

I need to write up something like that again soon, I think.

Reply


mmcirvin February 14 2011, 13:56:16 UTC
The Hudsucker Proxy is, I think, my favorite Coen movie or close to it. However, few people agree with me about this and a subset of Coen fans seem to actively hate it, so I've tended to keep quiet about it.

Reply

crisper February 14 2011, 18:18:53 UTC
HUDSUCKER PROXY is definitely more or less the opposite of, say, NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN at least in terms of how it's intended to make you feel. I can see how some Coen fans of BLOOD SIMPLE and FARGO the like might feel betrayed by something so guilelessly joyful, but I thought it was a terrific demonstration of breadth on their part.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

crisper February 15 2011, 16:04:03 UTC
Didn't get out to see it in theaters; it will be coming up the NetFlix queue shortly. But calibrated response among my work friends suggests I will like it very much.

Reply


ikkyu2 February 14 2011, 16:03:55 UTC
All three of them suffer from feeling padded, at times, by drawn-out sequences that add nothing to the story but time.

Good thing that wasn't the case with AKIRA. ..

Why go through all the trouble of actually crafting a role that makes Gwyneth Paltrow appealing, and then underuse her in favor of ScarJo who, really, would be entirely appealing as a parking meter.

Is this a way of saying you don't like ScarJo? I am trying to see her actually playing a parking meter, but flashbacks to Ghost World are either interfering or making your point, I am not sure.

Reply

crisper February 14 2011, 18:21:23 UTC
No, the opposite - it's a way of saying, everyone already knows how they feel about ScarJo, there's no changing it at this point, so nobody has to invest a quarter of their Very Long Movie into making me like her even more. Meanwhile, they spent a substantial effort in the first movie making me like Gwyneth Paltrow, and then in the second film they just go ahead and let her turn back into the Disapproving Ice-Mommy that is her go-to movie role.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up