I can't decide if I'm thrilled that I got a card that suits me so well, or just a bit disappointed that I didn't get one that'll be really challenging. *g*
Although I am going to have to ponder the gangbang square, since I'm usually pretty strictly OTP-only. I can't decide if it would be disappointing to readers if "all those people, and you were the only one that mattered" was a part of the emotional text.
I know, right? I'm counting myself lucky that I didn't get ones that set off panic attacks for entirely unrelated to kink reasons, but there are some slightly more self-squicky options that I had totally psyched myself up for, and had gotten to the point where I wanted to write some because I'd come up with ideas I wanted to explore and ... oops. Next time
( ... )
but there are some slightly more self-squicky options that I had totally psyched myself up for, and had gotten to the point where I wanted to write some because I'd come up with ideas I wanted to explore and ... oops. Next time?
*grins* Me too! I had myself all steeled to handle a consent-play square. It didn't appear, but I still have the bunnies I was bracing myself to write.
And then I accidentally roped a friend into writing with me so now it's a coauthor card and that brings a whole other level of possible kink-engagement to the writing process.
*laughs* How does one accidentally rope in a co-author?
Dude, I think gangbangs can definitely be spun that way.
Thanks so much for your thoughts on this! I totally have a bunny for the gangbang square now. *grins* Not quite what I was thinking of before, but with elements of that, and also working in an idea that someone else mentioned. Now I just have to decide whose POV to write it from... *is torn* There are advantages to both.
I'm pretty happy with mine. The one thing I was hoping for didn't show up, but that's what the middle square is for I guess *g* And some things that will challenge me to write, which is good. I'm in a rut, kink-wise.
*laughs* According to the Kink Wiki, "Pervertibles is the kink term for objects not designed for sex that can be perverted into sexual use. Think belts, ping pong paddles, neckties, and spatula handles, and you've got the basics. This is a great kink for creative characters!"
I totally loled at that last line, because half the reason Kyle was chosen as a GL is his creativity. :-D
Comments 16
Reply
Although I am going to have to ponder the gangbang square, since I'm usually pretty strictly OTP-only. I can't decide if it would be disappointing to readers if "all those people, and you were the only one that mattered" was a part of the emotional text.
Reply
Reply
*grins* Me too! I had myself all steeled to handle a consent-play square. It didn't appear, but I still have the bunnies I was bracing myself to write.
And then I accidentally roped a friend into writing with me so now it's a coauthor card and that brings a whole other level of possible kink-engagement to the writing process.
*laughs* How does one accidentally rope in a co-author?
Dude, I think gangbangs can definitely be spun that way.
Thanks so much for your thoughts on this! I totally have a bunny for the gangbang square now. *grins* Not quite what I was thinking of before, but with elements of that, and also working in an idea that someone else mentioned. Now I just have to decide whose POV to write it from... *is torn* There are advantages to both.
Reply
Reply
How do you like your own card?
Reply
Reply
Planning on focusing on any one fandom, or will you jump around? *curious*
Reply
Is that like Lunch-ables, but with perverts?
Or maybe it's cars that hump each other?
*blink*
Reply
I totally loled at that last line, because half the reason Kyle was chosen as a GL is his creativity. :-D
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment