Comments | cracktran1: For future notice:

exprmentervok in cracktran1

For future notice:

Dec 18, 2007 13:14

Now, I do not mean to appear a bitch, but, but in regurds to my charatcter,m it seems that a few have the misconstructions about it.

The Vok will hold back information, doubly so if is important information. Also, they DID mention the fact that Bast, Hathor and Isis were off elsewhere.

Alas, the rest of you seem to not understand that. But none the ( Read more... )

ooc, vok, notice

Comments 16

twin_runabout December 18 2007, 04:35:48 UTC

The Vok was fun at the beginning, but I thought it was going to be done with after Thanksgiving.. and it's almost Christmas.

It's beginning to drag and I know a lot of players, including myself, are beginning to get very tired of the Vok. Yea, it's great to have a reoccurring bad guy.. but it's no fun anymore.

storm_skies December 18 2007, 05:07:15 UTC

I have to agree with everyone else. Drama is fun. Role play is fun. Drama and Role play is fun. However, doing this- without the consent of the players- is not. It pisses everyone off, and we've all tried being nice.

l_am_the_sun December 18 2007, 06:36:08 UTC

Personally, and reluctantly, I agree with many of the things being said here ( ... )

space_bound December 18 2007, 07:21:24 UTC

I have to jump the bandwagon and say that I agree with people, and I wasn't even there. Nevertheless, godmodding = boring stuff. Do not want.

And I have to completely agree with Sunstorm-mun. The sudden retcon of energy weapons is annoying, and utterly useless. I would imagine the Vok's energy blasts having different signatures/traces/what have you than the ones of Cybertronian design, yes? (The guilty, btw, does not want punishment! D; )

So for me it all comes down to the why you had to retcon energy weapons at all. It seems awfully tacked on, to be honest. :\

spacepirate_con December 18 2007, 07:41:19 UTC

Gonna try and keep this relatively civil, but intentional or not the impression I'm getting from this post of yours is "The Vok will still carry on trying." Which makes sense ICly, but I'm kinda wondering if you know where to draw the OOC-IC line if you're claiming we don't understand why the Vok wouldn't give away the information they have. We get THAT part, because that's the IC part. What people were asking for is OOC reasons; you as a mun giving us OOC explainations so that IC actions make more sense. The Vok may not ICly tell the other characters ICly what they're up to, but we as muns would sometimes like to check details over OOCly. Fair enough, right?

So yeah. If by "you have been warned" you mean "the Vok will keep trying and you will not be told the reasons why even OOCly," then that's not cool. There's no reasons why the muns shouldn't have that kinda information if they want it. Just because a mun knows something doesn't mean their character ICly does too ( ... )