I started reading The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein a couple of days ago and it's gonna be rough going. Not because I disagree with her, and I think I do disagree with her about some things which I'll talk about after I'm through with the whole book, but because she really goes after Milton Friedman
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
I think you're confusing the father (Milton Friedman) with the son (David Friedman).
Milton Friedman is a famous dead Nobel-prize-winning economist and heavyweight in the Chicago school.
David Friedman is still alive, and a crankish libertarian. Also an economist, but not a Nobel-prize-winning one, nor likely to be. (Writes fantasy novels for Baen as a hobby, natch.) And he's definitely written about decentralized/libertarian law enforcement (including a book titled, IIRC, "The Machinery of Freedom").
NB: this doesn't make Milton Friedman's economic doctrines any more palatable -- just that they're somewhat less extreme than the lunatical dystopia his son built on top of them.
Reply
But part of the reason I mentioned the article about how cops should be wholly independent is because Friedman was definitely for a totally independent central bank, something that Klein goes on about at some length, which seems of a piece with the idea that law enforcement should be equally freed from government control. I mean, if you're willing to push for a central bank that's free of all government control, why not cops?
But, like I said, could be. It's certainly easy enough to find David Friedman's nut job fuckery about anarcho-capitalism.
Reply
Reply
Reply
But while I wasn't aware of this specific story, one of the main motivations of my sci-fi writing has been a general awareness of the extent to which law enforcement is becoming privatized and what that means when, y'know, instead of citizens we are law enforcement consumers.
Still . . . these people are SY-KO.
Reply
Leave a comment