no relief

Aug 06, 2008 14:57

Absolutely sickening.

In a closely watched trial involving conflicting marijuana laws, a jury on Tuesday convicted the owner of a Morro Bay medical marijuana dispensary on five counts of violating federal drug laws ( Read more... )

tyranny, drugs, courts

Leave a comment

Comments 14

gentlemaitresse August 6 2008, 22:03:27 UTC
These are the kinds of people in prison with whom I'd like to correspond, send xmas cards to, maybe send care packages if they're allowed to receive them.

This is an absolute travesty of justice, but at the very least I wish there were a way to show my support for him and others like him.

Reply

cluebyfour August 6 2008, 22:15:49 UTC
Hopefully he can remain free while his case is appealed.

If not, however, there is a way to look up inmates in the Federal prison system, although you'll need either an ID number or the inmate's full name (and hope it doesn't return multiple matches).

Reply

gentlemaitresse August 6 2008, 22:17:05 UTC
Well, that's something, at least. I suppose one could also try to contact him through his attorney.

Reply


ms_cantrell August 6 2008, 22:18:01 UTC
that really is revolting. whomever pushed for this indictment and conviction is a complete shite.

Reply

cluebyfour August 6 2008, 22:19:55 UTC
The Federal prosecutor, obviously, and by extension the Bush administration, which is clearly intent on enforcing Federal drug laws no matter what the states allow.

Reply

phanatic August 7 2008, 00:01:32 UTC
And those fucking jurors. "We had no choice"? Of course you fucking did, you're the *jury*.

Reply

ms_cantrell August 7 2008, 01:05:50 UTC
well, yes, the federal prosecutor, but each office has an agenda and some discretion with what they prioritize.

Reply


ilcylic August 6 2008, 23:32:12 UTC
States need to start prosecuting local law enforcement who help the feds in cases like this.

"You work for us. You go on a drug raid for someone who isn't breaking our laws, that's a felony."

Qualified imminity, sadly, likely prevents the states from arresting the federal drug thugs directly.

Reply

phanatic August 7 2008, 00:02:11 UTC
It probably doesn't prevent the states from slapping them in handcuffs, driving them to the state line, and kicking them out of the car.

Reply

ilcylic August 7 2008, 00:16:18 UTC
I find your ideas compelling, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

Reply


hotforeignsheep August 7 2008, 02:26:11 UTC
And this is why we need to brief our jurors on the concept of jury nullification. Oh, wait, they do, they just tell them it's not allowed. Which is of course bullshit.

Reply

graey42 August 7 2008, 14:22:15 UTC
How can they just flat out lie like that? I can understand bending the rules as far as possible, but isn't out and out lying against the rules somewhere?

Reply

cluebyfour August 7 2008, 15:17:36 UTC
The judge probably didn't mention anything about nullification, and most jurors wouldn't know about it. He did, however, bar the defense from bringing it up, nor did he allow them to present witnesses and evidence to show that he was a) helping people, and b) operating within state law.

Reply

allknight August 7 2008, 17:23:33 UTC
This makes me wonder how much of these decisions by the judge were discretionary VS mandated...

Reply


Leave a comment

Up