Leave a comment

Comments 35

kvschwartz September 14 2008, 01:08:55 UTC
Oh, no! :(

Reply


chorusgirl September 14 2008, 01:13:56 UTC
2008 strikes again.

Reply

amberdulen September 14 2008, 01:16:50 UTC
My thoughts exactly.

Reply

cleolinda September 14 2008, 01:28:43 UTC
I didn't want to say it, because a number of people have complained that the deaths of celebrities (read: people we don't actually know) aren't really that important in the grand scheme of things, compared to people who might be having good or bad years based on events in their own lives. You know, something to that effect, from various commenters. But... yeah. If you separate out the category of celebrity deaths... it's been bad.

Reply


incognito323 September 14 2008, 01:29:06 UTC
2008 IS A HORRIBLE YEAR IF YOU ARE VAGUELY FAMOUS OR SUCCESSFUL D:

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

cleolinda September 14 2008, 01:56:03 UTC
I'll be honest, I haven't read any of his work (maybe an essay, I can't remember), but he was (from what I've heard) a brilliant writer, a very important figure on the modern literary scene, a MacArthur genius grant recipient, and so on. I'm trying to think of a comparable name from an earlier generation of writers and I'm not sure what comparison to make, but... it's shocking.

Reply

sobell September 14 2008, 02:22:25 UTC
I think you'd really enjoy the essay collection "A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again." It's a decent primer to his writing style. Here's the first chapter: http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/w/wallace-fun.html.

Reply

cleolinda September 14 2008, 02:35:30 UTC
Yeah, someone else recommended that to me--I think I'll have to get it. I just hate that this is the reason I'm actually going to read it now, you know? It's so sad.

Reply


edda September 14 2008, 01:47:41 UTC
Oh shit. I LOVED his nonfiction. And bizarre as it sounds, I was literally thinking of him for the past two days and hoping he'd do some more kickass essays.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up