okay, without looking it up...

Sep 27, 2010 15:08

Does this usage of eponymous seem okay to you or not? Why?

[blah blah Chekhov on film] "Based on his eponymous 1891 novella, THE DUEL gives life to a classic Chekhovian tale...."

All right. Look it up if you want to, but let me know if you do.

I'm screening comments for a bit to get independent answers, but I'll unscreen them soonish. [Edit: ( Read more... )

usage geeking

Leave a comment

Comments 47

neon_epiphany September 27 2010, 19:13:48 UTC
What, was the novella called "Anton Chekhov"? Because if not, it rubs me as wrong, wrong, WRONG.

Reply

exactly clauclauclaudia September 27 2010, 20:55:25 UTC
I had thought eponymous meant strictly "self-titled", like "Melissa Etheridge", the album. It's slightly broader than that, but it does mean something named after a particular person. I believe The Duel not to be a person. ;-)

Reply

emmacrew September 27 2010, 21:28:47 UTC
This.

Reply


jadasc September 27 2010, 19:17:02 UTC
Doesn't eponymous mean "named after the author or creator?"

Reply

not quite... clauclauclaudia September 27 2010, 20:58:36 UTC
Though that's certainly common usage these days. But it does mean named after a person.

Reply


heatherbelles September 27 2010, 19:17:09 UTC
This is probably going to result in me embarrassing myself, but isn't 'eponymous' mean something along the name of 'bearing the same name'?

Like 'the film JFK focuses not on its eponymous President, but on the conspiracy theories surrounding the shooting' Or 'Russell Crowe plays the eponymous hero in Robin Hood/Gladiator'.

So, no the sentence wouldn't make sense - the film would have to be called Chekov, wouldn't it, for it to make sense?

I was tempted to look it up and check but haven't. I might once I've submitted this though!

Reply

almost! clauclauclaudia September 27 2010, 21:00:42 UTC
I think I would go with "titular" in the Crowe sentence. Eponymous means named for a specific person, and I'm not sure Gladiator qualifies. It certainly comes miles closer than The Duel, though.

Reply


novalis September 27 2010, 19:20:01 UTC
I would give it at best a ? but probably a *. Eponymous things, I think, are named after a person or group. But ordinary usage is sloppy, and here it is clear that the 1891 novella is called "The Duel" rather than "Chekhov."

Reply


bikergeek September 27 2010, 19:22:14 UTC
It does not. "Eponymous" is used to describe a work named for the author, e.g. "Boston's eponymous first album led off with the mega-hit 'More Than a Feeling,'" or "Jane Schmoe's eponymous memoir details the ins and outs of her more than three decades as a public-interest advocate on Capital Hill."

Reply

pretty close clauclauclaudia September 27 2010, 21:02:27 UTC
As I am definitionally in pedantic mode with this post, I'll give you a "correct but incomplete". ;-) See my earlier replies.

Reply

Re: pretty close bikergeek September 28 2010, 09:06:49 UTC
Interesting. I am now edified. :-)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up