Politics Rage!

Jan 10, 2012 18:05

I have so much rage, I don't even know how to respond to this, "If you hate bigots, are you a bigot (by the definition)?" It's wrong, but I can't turn my knowing that into a coherent argument. :( Anybody have any ideas?

politics

Leave a comment

Comments 1

ocotillo_dawn January 11 2012, 00:51:40 UTC
From the World English Dictionary:

bigot (ˈbɪɡət)

- n
a person who is intolerant of any ideas other than his or her own, esp on religion, politics, or race

[C16: from Old French: name applied contemptuously to the Normans by the French, of obscure origin]

'bigoted

- adj

The reason this is such a difficult argument to refute is that in a strict reading of the definition, they're correct. It's a sort of conundrum -- comes up with 'intolerant' too, is intolerance of intolerance really intolerance?

So people who do this are using word-play to justify themselves. I'm not sure it's worth arguing with people like this at all. I mean, they've admitted they are bigots, so what's the point?

Their wordplay doesn't refute the fact that being a bigot towards bigots is a much more defensible moral position than being a bigot towards someone who's got little to no say in who they are or whose beliefs or activities don't rely on belittling others (e.g., any give black man, Jews, gays).

Reply


Leave a comment

Up