Comments | cielamara: Yep.

cielamara

Yep.

Mar 13, 2011 03:57

This piece from Mother Jones explains why the NYT article was so awful ( Read more... )

i hate everyone, let me tell you internets, public service announcement, ohshi-, wtf, wat, well bless your stupid little heart, audience participation, oop, rageosaurus rex, the civilized south rejects you, fail and such, why?, dammitalltohell, yes seriously, are you shitting me, wait seriously?, do not want, oh my god he's still talking?, be excellent, stupid, ...awkward

Comments 5

loototherah March 13 2011, 15:53:26 UTC

This is a great response.

That article still sickens me, and I told all my friends at school about it. Consider that signal fucking boosted.

cielamara March 13 2011, 17:01:36 UTC

Damn straight. I mean, we can talk about how a reporter's just doing their job and all, but at the end of the day, that reporter definitely has a choice in who and what they quote and how they phrase things in their article.

wyrdmuse March 13 2011, 16:30:50 UTC

I believe the AP found people who realized how heinous this crime really is, so the NYT's excuse is just bullshit.

cielamara March 13 2011, 17:07:32 UTC

Indeed it is.

mixtape__murder March 14 2011, 00:53:24 UTC

That article triggered me so badly it was ridiculous. I ended up donating some cash to Houston area rape crisis centers to feel a little more sane. UGH PEOPLE ARE SO DISGUSTING.