Leave a comment

Comments 12

scottks January 13 2008, 15:25:34 UTC
Did they have the Campbell's soup dress?

http://scottks.livejournal.com/1216549.html

Reply

chu_hi January 13 2008, 15:38:14 UTC
Ooh! No! I saw those Mao portraits. But I didn't see a Campbell's soup dress!

Reply


cortezthekiller January 13 2008, 16:33:04 UTC
okay, forget Warhol... these pictures are amazing in themselves! I LOVE THESE!

Reply

chu_hi January 13 2008, 18:14:08 UTC
Thank you! I had fun taking them. =)

Reply


dubaiwalla January 13 2008, 17:16:57 UTC
I love how Warhol's art feels so accessible and unpretentious.

Reply

chu_hi January 13 2008, 18:14:23 UTC
Me too. It's inspiring.

Reply


webwawa January 13 2008, 20:37:10 UTC
wish i could see those little pieces on the wall with the hands!

Reply

chu_hi January 14 2008, 06:40:36 UTC

... )

Reply

webwawa January 14 2008, 16:16:17 UTC
oh, ha~!

was photography allowed? uhmmMMM~! ;)

Reply

chu_hi January 15 2008, 04:59:33 UTC
It was not. I would've gotten a lot more if I hadn't had to be sneaky!

Reply


nononnon January 13 2008, 21:28:04 UTC
This exhibit is only about 10,000% more involved than the one up here. Boo to here.

And, from looking for a bit, isn't it interesting how the prints are so...underwhelming? It's almost exactly similar to looking at Warhol prints in a magazine -- as opposed to the grandeur of a Rothko, or something with layers and layers you knly notice up close. I really respect that, though I can't explain why.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up