Ah, I disagree on a lot of the recommendations. Mallory provides good background, but I wasn't enamored with the book enough to want to buy it. Of course, I appear to be the only one in my library to have checked it out in the past 10 years.
I LOVE LOVE LOVE How to Kill a Dragon, and I think any academically-inclined ADFer should own that book. It has some of the best analysis of myth I've ever seen, and makes certain connections clear that I had puzzled over for years. Also, it's the only time I've seen ADF's central dogma discussed outside of ADF (*ghosti). It is an invaluable source, and I've already read it twice.
Also not as big a fan of AA MacDonnell. He's big into that naturalistic interpretation of myth, which while interesting isn't nearly as helpful as something from a Dumezilian perspective.
Well, it's not so much about which books are good so much as which ones are useful for someone trying to get through the CTP/IP/GSP. This is a very, very functional list.
I've just used Mallory so much that I have found it better to have it on hand than not to, particularly for the courses with "IE" in their titles. That recommendation is based on how often I went back to use it rather than anything else.
Watkins, for study program use, is only "useful" for a single question, and that question only requires chapter 2.
MacDonnell gives good depth of detail quickly that can be useful for someone who is only familiar with a single hearth culture, so that's why he's included here as a borderline borrow/buy.
True. I just had to give out some Watkins love. Cuz really, that with Rees & Rees are like the best IE studies books I've ever seen.
I think I get away with not using Mallory all that much (except for IE Studies 1) because I can find a lot of that info in Puhvel or Watkins or what have you.
Just curious, is it normal to have a really extensive bibliography? My CTP bibliography is currently 5 pages long, and I've only done half a dozen courses. That survey question about needing outside sources, well, with the exception of Structures, Customs, and Policy I've needed significant amounts of outside sources. The recommended reading is like nowhere near sufficient. Or, maybe I'm an overachiever.
Well, I have two bibliographies (and you can see the review process tighten up when you compare them, interestingly enough, as I did my source citations over several years, especially when you compare them to my most recent submissions that had 2009 MLA citations):
That'll give you an idea of how much raw material I worked with, including background reading and such that wasn't directly cited. Not all of it made it into the coursework, but I'd say at least 90% of the second link did, and maybe around 75% of the "full" bibliography did.
So, no, it's not uncommon to hit 5 pages :) I apparently hit 9 :) But I think that does have to do with overacheiving. You can get away with a lot less, if you want to (or are on a tight budget, have a crappy library to borrow from, and virtually no personal library to start with). The best information is spread out among many books, but you can get "passable" information from just a couple.
Comments 7
I LOVE LOVE LOVE How to Kill a Dragon, and I think any academically-inclined ADFer should own that book. It has some of the best analysis of myth I've ever seen, and makes certain connections clear that I had puzzled over for years. Also, it's the only time I've seen ADF's central dogma discussed outside of ADF (*ghosti). It is an invaluable source, and I've already read it twice.
Also not as big a fan of AA MacDonnell. He's big into that naturalistic interpretation of myth, which while interesting isn't nearly as helpful as something from a Dumezilian perspective.
Reply
I've just used Mallory so much that I have found it better to have it on hand than not to, particularly for the courses with "IE" in their titles. That recommendation is based on how often I went back to use it rather than anything else.
Watkins, for study program use, is only "useful" for a single question, and that question only requires chapter 2.
MacDonnell gives good depth of detail quickly that can be useful for someone who is only familiar with a single hearth culture, so that's why he's included here as a borderline borrow/buy.
Reply
I think I get away with not using Mallory all that much (except for IE Studies 1) because I can find a lot of that info in Puhvel or Watkins or what have you.
Just curious, is it normal to have a really extensive bibliography? My CTP bibliography is currently 5 pages long, and I've only done half a dozen courses. That survey question about needing outside sources, well, with the exception of Structures, Customs, and Policy I've needed significant amounts of outside sources. The recommended reading is like nowhere near sufficient. Or, maybe I'm an overachiever.
Reply
Full GSP Bibliography
GSP Bibliography by course (incl. only 8 out of 11 courses for some reason)
That'll give you an idea of how much raw material I worked with, including background reading and such that wasn't directly cited. Not all of it made it into the coursework, but I'd say at least 90% of the second link did, and maybe around 75% of the "full" bibliography did.
So, no, it's not uncommon to hit 5 pages :) I apparently hit 9 :) But I think that does have to do with overacheiving. You can get away with a lot less, if you want to (or are on a tight budget, have a crappy library to borrow from, and virtually no personal library to start with). The best information is spread out among many books, but you can get "passable" information from just a couple.
Reply
2) I wish I had this before I started Magic I.
3) When finished, this should be in Oak Leaves!
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment