Hotness Conversion Chart

Feb 20, 2009 03:18




Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 25

jameel February 20 2009, 11:34:01 UTC
Outstanding.

Reply

chrismaverick February 20 2009, 15:03:26 UTC
glad you approve

Reply


anonymous February 20 2009, 11:46:54 UTC
This is good. mh was used for the millihelen anyway. Although the millihelen is on some level a more objective unit of measurement, in that you can test for a ship launch.

Reply

firimari February 20 2009, 14:35:45 UTC
Yeah, minihelen is a much longer tested geek unit of hotness measurement. The logarithmic scale does make for a better yardstick.

Reply

firimari February 20 2009, 14:37:50 UTC
Especially since the wealth needed to launch a ship (these being Greek times, something on the order of a trireme) is no longer in the realm of states. Paris Hilton could probably use her wealth to launch quite a few yachts, but she's still a skank.

Reply

chrismaverick February 20 2009, 15:17:25 UTC
exactly, the flickr post has some rollover notes on it that get specifically into the paris hilton phenomenon.

Reply


tmaher February 20 2009, 14:57:20 UTC
Shakira is 110 dH, you mean.

Reply

chrismaverick February 20 2009, 15:18:15 UTC
oops. that was a typo. Thanks. Did you actually check the math or did you notice just from the description.

Reply

tmaher February 20 2009, 15:44:50 UTC
It sounded off by the description, which prompted me to check the math. Intuitively, if Bob is twice as hot as Alice, Bob should measure 10dH higher than her.

Reply

chrismaverick February 21 2009, 16:13:45 UTC
yep. I had just accidentally transposed the numbers when I was typing.

Reply


maneman February 20 2009, 15:36:43 UTC
Thank you. That was incredibly insightful and possessed of intense calculation.

Reply

chrismaverick February 20 2009, 15:40:56 UTC
thanks.

Reply


maneman February 20 2009, 15:39:59 UTC
I forgot to leave this in my earlier comment, but would you mind if I share your flickr picture with some other feminine beauty mathematicians? I feel like this post could push the classification of feminine beauty well into the next century.

Reply

chrismaverick February 20 2009, 15:41:25 UTC
By all means, please, link them there or here. I'd really like other's insight.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up