Irene interfered with my plans to write a review for Let's Kill Hitler and then life happened (Distractions everywhere!) but I do want to post my thoughts before the next episode. *checks clock* I still have MINUTES! Hours? Whatever, I have time. \o/
Basically this episode was quintessential Moffat - both good and bad.
(
Doctor Who Review of Let's Kill Hitler )
Comments 10
Mal is suddenly physically a woman. Not just an early teen/twenties young woman, but an adult. With curves.
The tux? I think he had to have gone to the wedding. It was mentioned too many times for it to not play a part. He was either somehow interacting with Mal or getting River to take the diary to Amy. Remember how no one but River (and later Amy) remembered the Doctor because she delivered the diary.
Now that I think about it, did he take Mel back and plant her? Is that why she was not at the wedding?
There is some serious wibbly wobbly to be sorted out.
This episode was all over the place.
Reply
( ... )
Reply
I initially wanted Chiwetel Ejiofor for 11.
Reply
Reply
THIS I agree 100% on literally every single thing you said good and bad, but that summarises my thoughts series 6 in general perfectly.
Reply
Reply
I was really very annoyed at Amy's and Rory's acceptance of the Doctor's telling them that now they know Melody turns out okay, they don't have to worry any more. Whaaaat?! They've lost their baby! It doesn't matter that Amy didn't know she was pregnant as far as I'm concerned. I'm not one who's ever really gotten into the "Moffat is a sexist bastard" argument, but if anything's going to get me there, that was it.
Most of fandom, however, seems not to have noticed that that was incredibly callous :(
Reply
Reply
I adore Eleven, Amy (and that took awhile!) and Rory and that is purely down to the actor's talent I think. Emotional depth and "heart" has been lacking but my perception is that it has been deliberate on Moffatt's part in order to appeal primarily to the children. If that's the case I could understand the lack of angst and agonizing grief over losing a child.
I'll be the first to rant about RTD's plot holes, etc. but he was/is great at engaging both audiences primarily down to the heart and emotion he gave us huge scoops of each week. And the man was a master of angst.
Reply
Perhaps so though I don't think that children would have a problem with emotion in shows. I see it more as Moffat's focus on plot - and it is a very complicated one that I'm sure had twists we don't know about you even if we've seen glimpses of them. Emotions are sprinkled on top now rather than being integral to the show.
However, from a child's point of view, it does make sense to downplay the horror of what happened to River. If he explored it at all properly it would be scarier than any monster ever seen on Doctor Who. What child in the modern world hasn't had fears of strangers snatching them away drummed into their heads. But that is all the more reason NOT to go there in the first place. If you can't do justice to the story don't write it.
Reply
Leave a comment