Comments | chikaidestroyer: ∞ 14: A lulled mind

chikaidestroyer

∞ 14: A lulled mind

Feb 15, 2008 17:25

...It doesn't make sense. There was no warning this time.

Is this the new norm? Will they give us no warnings in the future?

⁑itsuki koizumi, ⁑sheena fujibayashi, ⁑albel nox, no more lust-driven high, ⁑yuan, ⁑caesar silverberg, brotherly talk, ⁑lloyd irving, missing obvious signs

Comments 65

corrinesbell February 16 2008, 04:00:42 UTC

...No warning?

Wait, you mean...you mean we're part of another experiment?!

chikaidestroyer February 16 2008, 06:09:17 UTC

We are. And sad as it sounds, I'm glad that I'm not the only one who didn't realize.

Have you been affected, Sheena?

corrinesbell February 16 2008, 06:33:27 UTC

...I...I don't know. I don't feel different. ...Aside from being angry.

What's the experiment?

chikaidestroyer February 16 2008, 06:44:19 UTC

Well, the experiment seems to start with people falling in love by conversing with someone over the journals. Whoever comments first on an entry falls in love with the writer.

...At least it's only one person, and not everyone who you talk to.

Thread 6