Voting reforms I would like to see (unlikely as they may be):
1. No "vote straight party" options. The right to vote is important and
was hard-won; it is not too much to require that you actually vote for
candidates.
2. All voting is write-in. If you can't bother to learn, or write down
(
Read more... )
Comments 40
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
(2) Not sure on this.. we have enough candidates that I don't hear of until I get the ballot (and then have to go online to research) that I like having at least a list of names in a booklet. My handwriting is also so poor that my vote would no longer count. ;-)
(3) Oh, you would have loved Elihu Harris. His staff basically handed out coupons for free chicken dinners for people who voted for him. I kid you not.
Reply
And you could bring that list of names with you -- no problem there. It's not a memory test.
My handwriting is also so poor that my vote would no longer count. ;-)
I was actually thinking of write-ins being implemented as type-ins. Much easier for everybody.
(3): oh my...
Reply
Ah, I vote absentee. My polling place is inconvenient, and I much prefer lying down with the booklet and a laptop when deciding on who to vote for. Once that part is done I don't want to have to fill in a second ballot.
Reply
In California, before every state-wide election, a voter information booklet is mailed (by the state) to every registered voter. Each candidate is allowed to fill a single page with whatever he likes. Each ballot measure gets one page for the pro- and one page for the con-, and one additional page of independent fiscal analysis.
That booklet was INCREDIBLY valuable to me as a voter, and I am convinced that it led to a better-informed electorate. I would pay higher taxes for this service in Pennsylvania.
Reply
That booklet sounds like a huge win. Was any of it funded by the candidates, or did the state pay for the whole thing?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment