Comments | cellio: allegiances: SCA and synagogue

cellio

allegiances: SCA and synagogue

Aug 05, 2005 11:35

I was discussing my decreased involvement in the SCA (over the last decade or so) with a friend who suggested that I've shifted my social allegiance from the SCA to my synagogue. This is something I've thought about before and I want to record a comment I made in that discussion ( Read more... )

synagogue leadership, behavior, sca, sca: philosophy

Comments 5

patsmor August 5 2005, 19:51:06 UTC

I have to agree totally about the change in structure in the SCA. That's one of the reasons I'm glad I'm in the West -- I don't have to fight as hard as I did in the Midrealm to try to promote more reasonable policies. (No, we do NOT discuss this topic at family get-togethers. DUH.)

ellipticcurve August 5 2005, 20:58:17 UTC

OK, what was the policy change? Now I'm all curious... :)

cellio August 5 2005, 22:22:20 UTC

I'll answer the question, but it requires some background first.

The SCA has a corporation (to which members belong if they pay annual dues) and a network of local groups. Local groups don't get financial support from the corporation; they raise their own funds and use them to host events that people pay to attend. So you'd think that membership in SCA Inc is something like membership in the Audoban Society -- something you do because it feels good and supports a cause you like, but not something that has practical financial impact for you (beyond the tax deduction).

In 1993 SCA Inc decided that they weren't getting enough membership dollars and a financial crisis was looming. (This crisis turned out to be vapor, but it took a lawsuit to find that out.) So they required membership in the corporation in order to attend local events. That set off a firestorm, because the corporation doesn't provide those events (local groups that sink or swim on their own work do). But over time the "membership is good" meme has taken root and ( ... )

nobble August 6 2005, 00:05:01 UTC

In Australia there are people who also have this 'pay to play' attitude. It does divide the SCA community. Having said that, people continue to opt to not pay for membership and still attend events. Some like me pay for membership and DONT attend events. I think that political wranglings within a social group spoils it for many.

Wish I had more time for my synagogue. I think that will happen over time. Particualrly when R is just a bit older.

cellio August 7 2005, 02:12:20 UTC

I think that political wranglings within a social group spoils it for many.

Indeed. It's sad when that happens to any group.

As for having time, young children can have a big impact. Fortunately, they don't say young forever. :-)