I said I wasn't going to do this,..

May 24, 2011 22:15

... but i'm so tired I can't think straight anyway, so I thought I might as well add my crackpot / exhaustion induced theories to the pile.

I watched The Rebel Flesh again the other night and remembered some of the stuff I forgot to put in my original post.

ETA - I refer to the synopsis for ep 7 in this

exhausted DW ramblings this way... )

telly, doctor who, fannish things, dw s6

Leave a comment

Comments 13

develish1 May 24 2011, 22:30:42 UTC
well you know where to find my ramblings, but yes I too leapt on the idea that the clone Doctor is the one we saw shot in the opening ep.

although......my thoughts were that it was either the real Doctor, or River in that space suit. She does go to prison for killing a man, remember? knowing SM though, anything possible, since he's clearly making it up as he goes along, lol

Reply

caz963 May 26 2011, 22:48:42 UTC
The thing is, that while some things - like that idea of it being ganger!Eleven who is shot, two hundred years into his future - seem obvious, I start thinking that perhaps they're TOO obvious and discount them.

Having said that though, the latest spoilers are saying that it's been under our noses all the time, so maybe obvious is the way to go.

Reply


chloris May 25 2011, 04:06:49 UTC
Hmmm...I suppose a flesh and non-flesh Amy could explain the little bit pregnant thing. And the Silents did have her for a while -- long enough to do this. However, I still give a high probability for Moffat to add in some time loops or alternate universes from time splitting. (He does love that stuff.)

As for the Doctor, I think you're right on with the ganger!Doctor theory. Maybe not the details but here we have an episode full of CLONES which could easily give us a Doctor to kill without killing the Doctor.

(BTW: I did not know that Amy would be kidnapped until I read your post so I would consider that spoilery for the mid-season finale.)

Reply

caz963 May 25 2011, 16:04:15 UTC
Eeep! Sorry about the spoiler. The synopsis for ep 7 has been out for a couple of weeks and I assumed everyone'd read it because I'm usually the last person to find out!

There is also the possibility that "oooh. CLONES!" is just what Moff wants us to think and it'll turn out to be something else entirely :P

Reply

chloris May 27 2011, 01:36:10 UTC
Eh, I'm not upset. I just didn't know and wasn't expecting episode 7 info here. :D

Reply

caz963 May 27 2011, 07:02:25 UTC
:-)

I've added a spoiler indication anyway. Must. Do. Better in future!

Reply


canterlevi May 25 2011, 11:39:34 UTC
(eyeballs rolling around in my head)

I must be the laziest viewer because I have stopped trying to understand where this story is going. Perhaps you can explain it to me over lunch when I get there, That way you can use flowcharts and illustrations and perhaps then I'll get a bit of a clue. I'll bring paper and crayons.

::grumbles:: at self.

Reply

caz963 May 26 2011, 22:52:41 UTC
My head hurts, too, but I think this is pretty mild theorizing compared to some of the stuff that's going on. I said somewhere the other day that if it weren't for the fact that I've always watched DW on a Saturday teatime, and that the kids like it, I might be reduced to waiting for the DVDs so I could watch it all at once.

Reply

canterlevi May 26 2011, 23:40:05 UTC
I got lost somewhere back in Series 5 and haven't been able to find my way since then.

Reply


kilodalton May 26 2011, 03:46:02 UTC
But it's too obvious, isn't it? That THAT is the version of Eleven who's killed by the lake in TIA?

Idk, I would have thought it was obvious that books are made out of paper, but he managed to stretch that concept into a two-parter - with a more complicated ganger concept, I can totally see him stretching that out 7-8 more episodes XD

In all seriousness, I really don't think Moffat's plot resolutions are all that impressive, and a lot of them are obvious in retrospect when you look back on them. So I think it's within the realm of possibility that that's what we're seeing here.

Either that, or that River marries the ganger. Or an alt!Eleven, which I've been saying for a while now. Too much talk about parallel universes/people in this series for it to be coincidental ...

Reply

caz963 May 26 2011, 22:51:04 UTC
Thing is (and as I've just said upthread) the latest spoilers are telling us "it's been under your nose all along!", so perhaps obvious is the way to go. We've got so hung up on Moffat being devious (which he undoubtedly is) that maybe we're forgetting that some things really ARE what they seem.

Also - what has ganger!Eleven been doing for two hundred years?

Reply

kilodalton May 27 2011, 01:05:36 UTC
We've got so hung up on Moffat being devious (which he undoubtedly is) that maybe we're forgetting that some things really ARE what they seem.

Exactly! That's what I'm betting.

Also - what has ganger!Eleven been doing for two hundred years?

Three words: Helen of Troy >.^

Reply

caz963 May 27 2011, 06:59:43 UTC
Helen of Troy

Heh. I said what, not who! *g*

Reply


Leave a comment

Up