If juxtaposing the "vocabularies" (context + symbol -> meaning) promotes the construction of new grammars, then wouldn't that limit the range of symbols with common construction?
It seems like a jump to presume that where the relationship previously was to real-life experiences, providing novel context will provoke expansion of conceptions. If it's all internal anyway, where is differences than stimulating creativity through noise?
Comments 1
It seems like a jump to presume that where the relationship previously was to real-life experiences, providing novel context will provoke expansion of conceptions. If it's all internal anyway, where is differences than stimulating creativity through noise?
Reply
Leave a comment