009 ♣ [voice]

[doubleoohbaby]

When presented with a character well known to many, is it really fair to judge them entirely upon what you've seen or heard of them in the past? Is there not the very real probability of misrepresentation upon the creators behalf

Comments

[Voice]

[ascending_angel]

Real smooth.

[Voice]

[doubleoohbaby]

As always.

[caststwoshadows]

An examination of double-standards, James?

[doubleoohbaby]

Something like that.

[caststwoshadows]

I rather approve.

[doubleoohbaby]

Well that is good news. I'd hate to upset.

[evangelined]

...I may be new to this whole 21st century culture, but I'm pretty sure that's really not somethin' you talk about in public to random strangers that ask about it out of the blue.

[doubleoohbaby]

We're all friends here.

[evangelined]

You must be one creepy friend, then.

[doubleoohbaby]

I haven't been called creepy in some time.

[Video]

[wondah]

Oh please.

[switch to video]

[doubleoohbaby]

Hm?

[Video]

[wondah]

Too many things to address here. In fact, I'm convinced you're not serious, and you're just fishing for reactions.

But your first example is vague and without context. Add the context of it being a man you've heard a lot about, and not just by one woman, or a man's behavior in the past ... and yes, it is perfectly acceptable to judge him. Be wary, cautious, whatever. The worst I am doing is denying him an opportunity to really get to know me, which I have the right to.

However, I wouldn't spread what I've heard, even if I believed it, if I had not experienced it for myself.

[Video]

[doubleoohbaby]

Good to know you doubt my intentions yet choose to answer anyway.

What if this man is capable of reforming?

[doubleoohbaby]

Really? Should someone your age really be observing such things?

[doubleoohbaby]

By your father?