Leave a comment

Comments 57

arielstarshadow December 13 2010, 15:33:29 UTC
I loved Archangel, but found the sequels lacking. I'll be curious to see how you feel about them.

Reply

calico_reaction December 13 2010, 15:40:21 UTC
I think I'll be happy if the world-building is expanded. I think. I did read on the author's website the same sentiment, that readers seem to prefer the first book in the series to the others.

Reply

marycatelli December 13 2010, 18:20:39 UTC
I found the sequels to not have enough world-building to make up for the weaker characters.

Reply

nicoleallee December 17 2010, 02:06:40 UTC
I agree.

Reply


janicu December 13 2010, 15:38:43 UTC
I'm so glad you liked this one. And I think I must be the only person who thought this was a nice cover and didn't wonder why the woman is having some kind of orgasmic experience.

But the book: I KNOW, RIGHT?! It's good stuff. Anyway, this is my favorite in the series. The other books are good too, but they didn't really wow me with "ooh, shiny new world", in the way that this one did.

Reply

calico_reaction December 13 2010, 15:41:45 UTC
Well, the orgasmic experience is clearly because she's singing, right? ;) Nah, the rest of us must be horny toads or something. :)

I look forward to reading more, but given the teetering stacks of the TBR pile, I'm going to wait to pick those up. :) But I'm glad I finally read this. It mixes SF and fantasy in a way that really resonates with me.

Reply


aliciaaudrey December 13 2010, 15:55:55 UTC
My big beef with this is the stupidest beef I think I've ever had with an angel-type story: the biomechanics of human wings capable of flight? IMPOSSIBLE, according to a physicist I know and a evolutionary biologist I know. They would have to be CRAZY INSANELY HUGE ( ... )

Reply

aliciaaudrey December 13 2010, 15:58:47 UTC
ooof, got a hanging sentence there. Blast. I was going to say "I probably know too many doctors."

Reply

calico_reaction December 13 2010, 17:38:39 UTC
I got the impression the wings were quite large, though probably not as large as they'd scientifically need to be. Though, that said, I wonder if it'd be different if the angels were somehow bio-mechanical?

I'm still not straight on the Kiss. Sure, it's a tracker, and I get that it records biological data and would flare up next to someone with ideal compatibility biologically speaking, but beyond that, I didn't gather much.

Glad to know you've read this one, though, because I was hoping to hear your thoughts. :) And you're right: how funny it is that our perspectives change so much. Hell, I look at mid-twenties as being young now!

Reply

aliciaaudrey December 13 2010, 17:54:56 UTC
My understanding is to get the lift necessary to lift a human body we're talking REALLY. REALLY. REALLY. REALLY. large. Like, airplane size attached to a human body large, and I'm not talk'n about a little cessna! Humans just aren't built for flight in too many ways and to compensate for it, you'd need like jumbo jet wings. And then you'd be dealing with wings breaking under their own weight ( ... )

Reply


temporaryworlds December 13 2010, 16:10:25 UTC
I think I need to read this one :)

Reply

calico_reaction December 13 2010, 17:39:02 UTC
You do! I happily await your thoughts!

Looks like you won a contest over on Jim Hines' blog. Congrats!

Reply

temporaryworlds December 13 2010, 17:42:58 UTC
Thanks! I was really surprised about it :)

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

calico_reaction December 13 2010, 17:40:07 UTC
Very cool. It is the kind of book that's inspirational, and I wish over and over I'd read this while I was working on my own SF novel. There's so many things that I like, and it would've been good to study them while I was in a more critical frame of mind.

What are the other books that spurred you into writing fantasy?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up