Wesa and I have had somewhat of a conversation in the mix concerning religion, and I suppose what you'd call the nature thereof. She recently pointed me at an article
( Read more... )
(addendum to circumvent LJ's retarded comment length restrictions):
To wrap it up: I've responded to this post out of a general sense of fairness, despite the fact that you've made few points at all, much less supported them, along with being somewhat insulting (or at least attempting to be so) while remaining anonymous. If you'd like to continue this conversation, I'd be more than happy to oblige you. I'm not so set in my ways that I can't concede when necessary (as, indeed, I did at the beginning of my post). What I will NOT do is carry on a conversation at a high school level, which means any further anonymous replies, or replies containing little more than insults, will not only be ignored but deleted.
Comments 3
Reply
Reply
To wrap it up: I've responded to this post out of a general sense of fairness, despite the fact that you've made few points at all, much less supported them, along with being somewhat insulting (or at least attempting to be so) while remaining anonymous. If you'd like to continue this conversation, I'd be more than happy to oblige you. I'm not so set in my ways that I can't concede when necessary (as, indeed, I did at the beginning of my post). What I will NOT do is carry on a conversation at a high school level, which means any further anonymous replies, or replies containing little more than insults, will not only be ignored but deleted.
Reply
Leave a comment