Leave a comment

Comments 34

blackcat333_99 November 29 2009, 06:37:49 UTC
Umm... turkey wasn't in a cooking bag to help preserve moistness? I merely ask because I didn't see mention of a bag. But maybe there was and it ... got disappeared. Or was simply irrelevent to the final results. Just curious. :)

/is a brat, sorry.

Reply

caffienekitty November 29 2009, 07:09:09 UTC
I'm weird in that I believe the only plastic things that should go in an oven are Shrinky-Dinks. Also I had a bad 'microwave-able Jiffy-Pop' experience in college involving a plastic covered microwave popcorn thing and 20 cubic meters of melted-plastic smoke in a 2 cubic foot microwave, followed by black, greasy fire.

Also... I think I'm safer not experimenting with such things. This turkey was almost entirely salvageable in one form or another. Odds are, regardless of cooking bag properties, I would have managed to melt it or set it on fire and made it entirely unsalvageable. I did have a kind of tinfoil wrap though. Most of the rest is either going to be soup or reheated in sauce of some kind, so the desiccation isn't a bad thing. :-)

Reply

blackcat333_99 November 29 2009, 07:23:06 UTC
No, I totally see where you're coming from in the "plastic+oven=not good" thing. I just asked because I remember back in my childhood my mom used to cook them covered by tin foil, and at some point she did switch to the special cooking bags, and there was a noticeable difference in the moistness. Turkeys probably one of the few things I'd use the bag in an oven for, lol. But both ways work, obviously. :)

Reply


erinrua November 29 2009, 06:50:14 UTC

o__O

.

Reply

caffienekitty November 29 2009, 07:11:45 UTC
Yeah, that about sums it up.

Reply


tkf2009 November 29 2009, 07:06:37 UTC
ROTFLMAO!

Am going to have to procure myself a kitchen chisel.

Reply

caffienekitty November 29 2009, 07:13:02 UTC
They are handy, especally when you frequently end up with a quarter-inch of burnt-on goo in cookware.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

caffienekitty November 29 2009, 09:03:04 UTC
Indeed.

Reply


abrakadabrah November 29 2009, 11:16:22 UTC
Fun times!

I like the jerky by-product!

Anyway, it's 20 minutes a pound at *250* - not 350. At 350, it's 9 minutes a pound or so.

Reply

caffienekitty November 29 2009, 21:26:37 UTC
I like the jerky by-product!

It's rather tasty, actually! :-)

Anyway, it's 20 minutes a pound at *250* - not 350. At 350, it's 9 minutes a pound or so.

Yeah, that would make quite a difference.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up