Part One.
Part TwoThe thing that's beginning to strike me about this book, in contrast to many (especially later) books I've read, is that there's no B-plot. It's all Kristy's Krushers, all the time. That's not so bad, but my eyes are starting to glaze over from all the blah blah kids blah blah baseball blah blah two year olds playing baseball. I
(
Read more... )
Comments 22
Reply
Sorry for the serial editing, there.
Reply
I'm not saying the five year olds were any good, they spent most of the time in the outfield looking for dandelions, but they understood what they were supposed to be doing (and my sister even hit the ball once, when my dad promised he would clean her room for her if she did it.)
I could maybe see a mature two year old playing tee-ball. But hitting a moving object, even a wiffle ball, even if they don't duck? Not happening.
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
And I've neeeeever understood Gabbie-the-Genius' ~softballing ~abilities. If she can play, Marnie should play too, darnit.
Great snark! :D
Reply
Reply
Reply
this just made me laugh, cause you know the first signs they asked Matt about were things like `fart', `ugly', `boobs', etc. cause they're 10 yr old boys.
Now. I don't remember the title of the book, but it was one that was snarked recently, where Andrew (?) had this problem of letting the bat go after he swung. I'm somewhat surprised that Ann didn't make a big PSA in this book about how it's unsafe to throw the bat.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I swear I read that snark and yet I totally didn't connect my batting cage memories to that book. Even though I see it mentioned in the snark. More fool me!
Reply
Leave a comment