Congrats on the progress. I have no interest in this version of your project at this time ('cause, I don't have a smart phone), but I am very impressed with the outpouring of support and what you've done with it. It really is, well, impressive.
One of the glaring omissions in the past has been definitions of longer words, which, in some way, has been taken care of in a newer version of Zyzzyva, at least where CSW is concerned. So, my suggestion right now, however small, is that you simply check whether a TWL word has a TWL definition and if it doesn't provide the CSW one. Thank you for your consideration!
I think that's a great suggestion, and shouldn't be too difficult to implement. In fact, in the very near future I hope to replace all the definitions with new definitions from a single source, probably Wiktionary. I think the only time separate definitions are needed in OWL and CSW would be cases where a word has an additional part of speech or conjugation in CSW. Otherwise, they might as well be identical.
Great view I recently hit on your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my incipient comment. I donât know what todiscloseexcept that I have enjoyed reading. Correct blog. I will keep visiting this blog very each.
Comments 8
Check your gmail inbox.
Reply
good luck on the app.
Reply
How convenient. :-)
Reply
Reply
Reply
One of the glaring omissions in the past has been definitions of longer words, which, in some way, has been taken care of in a newer version of Zyzzyva, at least where CSW is concerned. So, my suggestion right now, however small, is that you simply check whether a TWL word has a TWL definition and if it doesn't provide the CSW one. Thank you for your consideration!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment